Rollup of 15 pull requests #35898
Closed
Rollup of 15 pull requests #35898
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Issue rust-lang#35799 as a part of issue rust-lang#35233 ?r jonathandturner
Fixes rust-lang#35797. Signed-off-by: Johannes Löthberg <johannes@kyriasis.com>
Update lib.rs Update lib.rs Update E0438.rs Update E0437.rs Update E0435.rs
It used to say "Furtheremore" instead of "Furthermore".
A single missing article
Update E0033 to the new error format Part of rust-lang#35233 Addresses rust-lang#35498 "r? @jonathandturner
…ndturner Improve Path and PathBuf docs r? @steveklabnik
…ndturner Err codes r? @jonathandturner
…urner New format for E0426 Issue rust-lang#35799 as a part of issue rust-lang#35233 r? jonathandturner
…Gomez Update E0424 to the new error format Fixes rust-lang#35797. Part of rust-lang#35233. r? @GuillaumeGomez
Fix typos in unix/rwlock.rs r? @steveklabnik
…umeGomez Indicate where `core::result::IntoIter` is created. None
…omez E0435, E0437 & E0438 New Error Format Part of rust-lang#35801 , rust-lang#35802 and rust-lang#35803 r? @GuillaumeGomez Hi! Please review the changes.
…aumeGomez replace `Rem` example with something more evocative r? @steveklabnik
…llaumeGomez replace `Index` example with something more evocative of indexing r? @steveklabnik
…illaumeGomez replace `println!` statements with `assert!`ions in `std::ptr` examples r? @steveklabnik
added 4 commits
August 22, 2016 08:36
Fix "Furthermore" Typo in String Docs It used to say "Furtheremore" instead of "Furthermore".
…ple, r=GuillaumeGomez add example for `Rc::would_unwrap` Part of rust-lang#29372 r? @steveklabnik
rustc: Fix outdated comment cc rust-lang#35870 (comment) r? @eddyb
Minor type in CONTRIBUTING.md A single missing article
|
@bors r+ p=1 |
|
📌 Commit 1e5d804 has been approved by |
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
⌛ Testing commit 1e5d804 with merge e346258... |
|
@bors: retry force clean
|
|
⌛ Testing commit 1e5d804 with merge 67123dc... |
|
💔 Test failed - auto-mac-64-opt-rustbuild |
|
Closing for a re-roll |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
core::result::IntoIteris created. #35845, E0435, E0437 & E0438 New Error Format #35858, replaceRemexample with something more evocative #35861, replaceIndexexample with something more evocative of indexing #35864, replaceprintln!statements withassert!ions instd::ptrexamples #35878, Fix "Furthermore" Typo in String Docs #35879, add example forRc::would_unwrap#35881, rustc: Fix outdated comment #35882, Minor typo in CONTRIBUTING.md #35889