Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unimplement ExactSizeIterator for MIR traversing iterators #55271

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 26, 2018

Conversation

sinkuu
Copy link
Contributor

@sinkuu sinkuu commented Oct 22, 2018

If root is not START_BLOCK, basic_blocks().len() - visited does not represent their exact size.

If root is not START_BLOCK, `basic_blocks().len() - visited` does not represent
their exact size.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @matthewjasper

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 22, 2018
@matthewjasper
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 23, 2018

📌 Commit 80a6b73 has been approved by matthewjasper

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 23, 2018
pietroalbini added a commit to pietroalbini/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2018
Unimplement ExactSizeIterator for MIR traversing iterators

If `root` is not `START_BLOCK`, `basic_blocks().len() - visited` does not represent their exact size.
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2018
Unimplement ExactSizeIterator for MIR traversing iterators

If `root` is not `START_BLOCK`, `basic_blocks().len() - visited` does not represent their exact size.
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2018
Unimplement ExactSizeIterator for MIR traversing iterators

If `root` is not `START_BLOCK`, `basic_blocks().len() - visited` does not represent their exact size.
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2018
Unimplement ExactSizeIterator for MIR traversing iterators

If `root` is not `START_BLOCK`, `basic_blocks().len() - visited` does not represent their exact size.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2018
Rollup of 21 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #54816 (Don't try to promote already promoted out temporaries)
 - #54824 (Cleanup rustdoc tests with `@!has` and `@!matches`)
 - #54921 (Add line numbers option to rustdoc)
 - #55167 (Add a "cheap" mode for `compute_missing_ctors`.)
 - #55258 (Fix Rustdoc ICE when checking blanket impls)
 - #55264 (Compile the libstd we distribute with -Ccodegen-unit=1)
 - #55271 (Unimplement ExactSizeIterator for MIR traversing iterators)
 - #55292 (Macro diagnostics tweaks)
 - #55298 (Point at macro definition when no rules expect token)
 - #55301 (List allowed tokens after macro fragments)
 - #55302 (Extend the impl_stable_hash_for! macro for miri.)
 - #55325 (Fix link to macros chapter)
 - #55343 (rustbuild: fix remap-debuginfo when building a release)
 - #55346 (Shrink `Statement`.)
 - #55358 (Remove redundant clone (2))
 - #55370 (Update mailmap for estebank)
 - #55375 (Typo fixes in configure_cmake comments)
 - #55378 (rustbuild: use configured linker to build boostrap)
 - #55379 (validity: assert that unions are non-empty)
 - #55383 (Use `SmallVec` for the queue in `coerce_unsized`.)
 - #55391 (bootstrap: clean up a few clippy findings)
@bors bors merged commit 80a6b73 into rust-lang:master Oct 26, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants