Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove the extra comma after the match arm #64632

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 21, 2019
Merged

Conversation

guanqun
Copy link
Contributor

@guanqun guanqun commented Sep 20, 2019

This would follow the same coding style as all the other match arms in this file.

This would follow the same coding style as all the other match arms in this file.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @matthewjasper

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 20, 2019
@jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor

r? @jonas-schievink @bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 20, 2019

📌 Commit c3140ba has been approved by jonas-schievink

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 20, 2019
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2019
remove the extra comma after the match arm

This would follow the same coding style as all the other match arms in this file.
tmandry added a commit to tmandry/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2019
remove the extra comma after the match arm

This would follow the same coding style as all the other match arms in this file.
tmandry added a commit to tmandry/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2019
remove the extra comma after the match arm

This would follow the same coding style as all the other match arms in this file.
tmandry added a commit to tmandry/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2019
remove the extra comma after the match arm

This would follow the same coding style as all the other match arms in this file.
tmandry added a commit to tmandry/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2019
remove the extra comma after the match arm

This would follow the same coding style as all the other match arms in this file.
tmandry added a commit to tmandry/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2019
remove the extra comma after the match arm

This would follow the same coding style as all the other match arms in this file.
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2019
remove the extra comma after the match arm

This would follow the same coding style as all the other match arms in this file.
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2019
remove the extra comma after the match arm

This would follow the same coding style as all the other match arms in this file.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2019
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #64010 (Stabilize `param_attrs` in Rust 1.39.0)
 - #64136 (Document From trait for LhsExpr in parser)
 - #64342 (factor out pluralisation remains after #64280)
 - #64347 (Add long error explanation for E0312)
 - #64621 (Add Compatibility Notes to RELEASES.md for 1.38.0)
 - #64632 (remove the extra comma after the match arm)
 - #64640 (No home directory on vxWorks)
 - #64641 (Exempt extern "Rust" from improper_ctypes)
 - #64642 (Fix the span used to suggest avoiding for-loop moves)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit c3140ba into rust-lang:master Sep 21, 2019
@guanqun guanqun deleted the patch-1 branch September 21, 2019 22:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants