Rename clean::{ItemEnum -> ItemKind}, clean::Item::{inner -> kind} #79041
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jyn514
added
C-cleanup
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
This picked up a lot of bugs in rust-analyzer 😆 |
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 03cbee8 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
GuillaumeGomez
approved these changes
Nov 14, 2020
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2020
…as-schievink Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#77802 (Allow making `RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP` conditional on the crate name) - rust-lang#79004 (Add `--color` support to bootstrap) - rust-lang#79005 (cleanup: Remove `ParseSess::injected_crate_name`) - rust-lang#79016 (Make `_` an expression, to discard values in destructuring assignments) - rust-lang#79019 (astconv: extract closures into a separate trait) - rust-lang#79026 (Implement BTreeMap::retain and BTreeSet::retain) - rust-lang#79031 (Validate that locals have a corresponding `LocalDecl`) - rust-lang#79034 (rustc_resolve: Make `macro_rules` scope chain compression lazy) - rust-lang#79036 (Move Steal to rustc_data_structures.) - rust-lang#79041 (Rename clean::{ItemEnum -> ItemKind}, clean::Item::{inner -> kind}) - rust-lang#79058 (Move likely/unlikely argument outside of invisible unsafe block) - rust-lang#79059 (Print 'checking cranelift artifacts' to easily separate it from other artifacts) - rust-lang#79063 (Update rustfmt to v1.4.26) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
5 tasks
m-ou-se
added a commit
to m-ou-se/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2020
…illaumeGomez Rustdoc: JSON backend experimental impl, with new tests. Based on rust-lang#75114 by `@P1n3appl3` The first commit is all of rust-lang#75114, but squased to 1 commit, as that was much easier to rebase onto master. The git history is a mess, but I think I'll edit it after review, so it's obvious whats new. ## Still to do - [ ] Update docs. - [ ] Add bless option to tests. - [ ] Add test option for multiple files in same crate. - [ ] Decide if the tests should check for json to be equal or subset. - [ ] Go through the rest of the review for the original pr. (This is open because the test system is done(ish), but stuff like [not using a hashmap](rust-lang#75114 (comment)) and [using `CRATE_DEF_INDEX` ](rust-lang#75114 (comment)) hasn't) I'm also sure how many of these we need to do before landing on nightly, as it would be nice to get this in tree, so it isn't effected by churn like rust-lang#79125, rust-lang#79041, rust-lang#79061 r? `@jyn514`
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 2, 2020
Rustdoc: JSON backend experimental impl, with new tests. Based on rust-lang#75114 by `@P1n3appl3` The first commit is all of rust-lang#75114, but squased to 1 commit, as that was much easier to rebase onto master. The git history is a mess, but I think I'll edit it after review, so it's obvious whats new. ## Still to do - [ ] Update docs. - [ ] Add bless option to tests. - [ ] Add test option for multiple files in same crate. - [ ] Decide if the tests should check for json to be equal or subset. - [ ] Go through the rest of the review for the original pr. (This is open because the test system is done(ish), but stuff like [not using a hashmap](rust-lang#75114 (comment)) and [using `CRATE_DEF_INDEX` ](rust-lang#75114 (comment)) hasn't) I'm also sure how many of these we need to do before landing on nightly, as it would be nice to get this in tree, so it isn't effected by churn like rust-lang#79125, rust-lang#79041, rust-lang#79061 r? `@jyn514`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
r? @petrochenkov
cc @GuillaumeGomez
Follow-up to #77820 (comment).