Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #90224

Closed
wants to merge 17 commits into from

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

lcnr and others added 17 commits October 15, 2021 10:58
This fixes warning when building Rust and running tests:
```
warning: library kind `static-nobundle` has been superseded by specifying `-bundle` on library kind `static`. Try `static:-bundle`
warning: `rustc_llvm` (lib) generated 2 warnings (1 duplicate)
```
The makes the heading / documentation distinction clearer.
Normalize MIR with RevealAll before optimizations.

Fixes rust-lang#78442
Add rustc lint, warning when iterating over hashmaps

r? rust-lang/wg-incr-comp
…mez,camelid

Fix alignment of method headings for scannability

We sometimes use indentation to indicate something is a heading: The section that comes after is indented by 24px relative to the heading. However, the relationship between the "Implementations" section heading, the `impl` headings it contains, and the `pub fn` subheadings within each impl, is awkward. It goes **Implementations**, 15px indent, `impl`, 5px indent, `pub fn`, 4px indent, docblock.

I line up `impl` and `pub fn` with the `Implementations` heading, give `impl` a larger font size to indicate it is higher in the hierarchy, and indent the docblock a full 24px relative to their parent, matching the indents we use elsewhere to distinguish section headings. By letting the `pub fn` stick out to the left of the docblock, I think this makes methods significantly more scannable.

Related to rust-lang#59829

r? ``@camelid``

[Old](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/string/struct.String.html#implementations):

[![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/220205/138380233-9c63a0f2-0f80-40a3-ab3d-a1ee9fb7c5d8.png)](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/string/struct.String.html#implementations)

[New](https://jacob.hoffman-andrews.com/rust/outdent-methods/std/string/struct.String.html#implementations):

[![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/220205/138392479-b45fce3f-bf43-42e0-81ee-c4bb9ac35cda.png)](https://jacob.hoffman-andrews.com/rust/outdent-methods/std/string/struct.String.html#implementations)
…_ref_mut, r=oli-obk

Mark `{array, slice}::{from_ref, from_mut}` as const fn

This PR marks the following APIs as `const`:
```rust
// core::array
pub const fn from_ref<T>(s: &T) -> &[T; 1];
pub const fn from_mut<T>(s: &mut T) -> &mut [T; 1];

// core::slice
pub const fn from_ref<T>(s: &T) -> &[T];
pub const fn from_mut<T>(s: &mut T) -> &mut [T];
```

Note that `from_ref` methods require `const_raw_ptr_deref` feature (which seems totally fine, since it's being stabilized, see rust-lang#89551), `from_mut` methods require `const_mut_refs` (which seems fine too since this PR marks `from_mut` functions as const unstable).

r? `@oli-obk`
…petrochenkov

Repace use of `static_nobundle` with `native_link_modifiers` within Rust codebase

This fixes warnings when building Rust and running tests:
```
warning: library kind `static-nobundle` has been superseded by specifying `-bundle` on library kind `static`. Try `static:-bundle`
warning: `rustc_llvm` (lib) generated 2 warnings (1 duplicate)
```
@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 24, 2021
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ p=5 rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 24, 2021

📌 Commit bdf54db has been approved by matthiaskrgr

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Oct 24, 2021
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-xlregsa branch November 20, 2021 15:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants