Rollup of 6 pull requests #91996
Merged
Rollup of 6 pull requests #91996
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Also replace ' with " in rustdoc template
Adds intrinsics for truncdfsf2 and truncdfsf2vsp on ARM.
…stc_symbol_mangling, r=jackh726 Remove `in_band_lifetimes` from `rustc_symbol_mangling` Helping out with rust-lang#91867
…stc_trait_selection, r=petrochenkov Remove `in_band_lifetimes` from `rustc_trait_selection` Another one for rust-lang#91867
update stdarch 2 commits in d219ad6..0716b22 2021-12-9 23:50:37 +0000 to 2021-12-14 16:17:57 +0100 * Fix a bunch of typos ([Fix a bunch of typos stdarch#1267](rust-lang/stdarch#1267)) * Stabilize armv8 neon instruction set on aarch64 ([Stabilize armv8 neon instruction set on aarch64 stdarch#1266](rust-lang/stdarch#1266)) The update stabilizes armv8 neon instructions on aarch64. rust-lang#90972
Apply rust-logo class only on default logo Fixes rust-lang#91653.  Demo: https://rustdoc.crud.net/jsha/hashes/sha2/ r? ``@GuillaumeGomez``
…lacrum link to pref_align_of tracking issue If we are not going to remove this intrinsic (rust-lang#90877), I think we should at least have a place to centralize discussion around it, so here we go. Intrinsics don't have their own separate features and usually we instead use the public method for tracking it, but this one does not have such a method... so the tracking issue is just a regular link. (And then we sue it for the const part as well.)
Bump compiler-builtins to 0.1.66 Adds intrinsics for truncdfsf2 and truncdfsf2vsp on ARM. r? `@Amanieu`
rustbot
added
T-compiler
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=6 |
|
📌 Commit 7391962 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (f840216): comparison url. Summary: This change led to very large relevant mixed results 🤷 in compiler performance.
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
in_band_lifetimesfromrustc_symbol_mangling#91901 (Removein_band_lifetimesfromrustc_symbol_mangling)in_band_lifetimesfromrustc_trait_selection#91904 (Removein_band_lifetimesfromrustc_trait_selection)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup