Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert implementation of slice::swap #94342

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2022

Conversation

ibraheemdev
Copy link
Member

Due to the perf regressions noticed here, possible due to inlining? #88540 (comment)

r? @kennytm

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 25, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

r? @Dylan-DPC

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned Dylan-DPC and unassigned kennytm Feb 25, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 25, 2022

📌 Commit 072d35d has been approved by Dylan-DPC

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 25, 2022
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

@bors rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 25, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 072d35d with merge d973b35...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 26, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Dylan-DPC
Pushing d973b35 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Feb 26, 2022
@bors bors merged commit d973b35 into rust-lang:master Feb 26, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.61.0 milestone Feb 26, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (d973b35): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results. 6 results were found to be statistically significant but too small to be relevant.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

@m-ou-se
Copy link
Member

m-ou-se commented Jun 27, 2022

Should this be reverted again, since this made no difference in performance?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants