Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[tracking] SLSA 1.0 tracking issue #515

Open
mlieberman85 opened this issue Mar 3, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

[tracking] SLSA 1.0 tracking issue #515

mlieberman85 opened this issue Mar 3, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
type:feature New feature request

Comments

@mlieberman85
Copy link
Member

In the SLSA tooling meeting we just wanted to create some tracking issues in some of the projects like slsa-verifier for 1.0 support. Feel free to edit this ticket with other tickets/info regarding work to support 1.0
@mlieberman85 mlieberman85 mentioned this issue Mar 6, 2023
Closed
@ianlewis ianlewis added the type:feature New feature request label Apr 20, 2023
@ramonpetgrave64 ramonpetgrave64 mentioned this issue Jul 3, 2024
Merged
ramonpetgrave64 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 30, 2024
@ramonpetgrave64
feat: support npm cli provenance v1 attestations (#776)
7f3db92 
Fixes #614, #450, #449, #515

Adds support for NPM CLIs build provenances, generated when running `npm
publish --provenance --access public` from a [GitHub Actions
workflow](https://github.com/ramonpetgrave64/gundam-visor/blob/599500821344b070902a7a5666064bfdaba715df/.github/workflows/npm-publish.yml#L21).

## Testing

- added unit tests for some new helper functions
- added regression test cases

## Future work

- #493, so we can
do `--print-provenance`
- implemented in
#768 (comment)

---------

Signed-off-by: Ramon Petgrave <ramon.petgrave64@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
type:feature New feature request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ianlewis @mlieberman85