Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add SARIF support for snyk open-source #1622

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2021
Merged

Conversation

admons
Copy link
Contributor

@admons admons commented Feb 8, 2021

  • Ready for review
  • Follows CONTRIBUTING rules
  • Reviewed by Snyk internal team

What does this PR do?

Add "--sarif" option to Snyk Open Source

Here's a screenshot from Github code scanning with the result of the --sarif run

image

@admons admons requested review from a team as code owners February 8, 2021 13:00
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2021

Warnings
⚠️

Looks like you added a new Tap test. Consider making it a Jest test instead. See files like test/*.spec.ts for examples. Files found:

  • test/support/sarif-schema-2.1.0.js

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against a3ec441

@admons admons marked this pull request as draft February 8, 2021 13:29
@admons admons force-pushed the feat/open-source-sarif branch 3 times, most recently from 8ff359a to 89e80be Compare February 8, 2021 16:59
@admons admons requested a review from orsagie February 8, 2021 16:59
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2021

Expected release notes (by @admons)

features:
add SARIF support for snyk open-source (a3ec441)

  • I hereby acknowledge these release notes are 🥙 AWESOME 🥙

@admons admons marked this pull request as ready for review February 8, 2021 19:08
Copy link
Contributor

@orsagie orsagie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGreatTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants