Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modify the javadoc of @EnableWebFlux annotation #23457

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 13, 2019
Merged

Modify the javadoc of @EnableWebFlux annotation #23457

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 13, 2019

Conversation

Sauhardstark
Copy link
Contributor

@Sauhardstark Sauhardstark commented Aug 13, 2019

Previously the Javadoc of EnableWebFlux referred to configureMessageWriters() method in WebFluxConfigurer which wasn't there. Now it has been modified to give an example of the configureHttpMessageCodecs() method which is present

This fixes the issue 23452

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged or decided on label Aug 13, 2019
@sbrannen sbrannen self-assigned this Aug 13, 2019
@sbrannen sbrannen added in: web Issues in web modules (web, webmvc, webflux, websocket) type: documentation A documentation task and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged or decided on labels Aug 13, 2019
@sbrannen sbrannen changed the title Modified the javadoc of @EnableWebFlux annotation Modify the javadoc of @EnableWebFlux annotation Aug 13, 2019
@sbrannen sbrannen added this to the 5.2 RC2 milestone Aug 13, 2019
@sbrannen sbrannen merged commit 91c0fba into spring-projects:master Aug 13, 2019
@sbrannen
Copy link
Member

This has been merged into master.

Thanks for the PR!

sbrannen added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
in: web Issues in web modules (web, webmvc, webflux, websocket) type: documentation A documentation task
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants