[lldb][NFC] Actually test which method we call in TestCallOverriddenMethod #2

Teemperor · 2019-10-18T17:04:01Z

llvm-svn: 373051

This commit is needed to let the test added for the artificial constructor fix pass.

…ethod llvm-svn: 373051

Teemperor · 2019-10-18T17:04:14Z

hyp · 2019-10-19T02:29:05Z

This fixes a failing testcase on Fedora 30 x86_64 (regression Fedora 29->30): PASS: ./bin/lldb ./lldb-test-build.noindex/functionalities/unwind/noreturn/TestNoreturnUnwind.test_dwarf/a.out -o 'settings set symbols.enable-external-lookup false' -o r -o bt -o quit * frame #0: 0x00007ffff7aa6e75 libc.so.6`__GI_raise + 325 frame swiftlang#1: 0x00007ffff7a91895 libc.so.6`__GI_abort + 295 frame swiftlang#2: 0x0000000000401140 a.out`func_c at main.c:12:2 frame swiftlang#3: 0x000000000040113a a.out`func_b at main.c:18:2 frame swiftlang#4: 0x0000000000401134 a.out`func_a at main.c:26:2 frame swiftlang#5: 0x000000000040112e a.out`main(argc=<unavailable>, argv=<unavailable>) at main.c:32:2 frame swiftlang#6: 0x00007ffff7a92f33 libc.so.6`__libc_start_main + 243 frame swiftlang#7: 0x000000000040106e a.out`_start + 46 vs. FAIL - unrecognized abort() function: ./bin/lldb ./lldb-test-build.noindex/functionalities/unwind/noreturn/TestNoreturnUnwind.test_dwarf/a.out -o 'settings set symbols.enable-external-lookup false' -o r -o bt -o quit * frame #0: 0x00007ffff7aa6e75 libc.so.6`.annobin_raise.c + 325 frame swiftlang#1: 0x00007ffff7a91895 libc.so.6`.annobin_loadmsgcat.c_end.unlikely + 295 frame swiftlang#2: 0x0000000000401140 a.out`func_c at main.c:12:2 frame swiftlang#3: 0x000000000040113a a.out`func_b at main.c:18:2 frame swiftlang#4: 0x0000000000401134 a.out`func_a at main.c:26:2 frame swiftlang#5: 0x000000000040112e a.out`main(argc=<unavailable>, argv=<unavailable>) at main.c:32:2 frame swiftlang#6: 0x00007ffff7a92f33 libc.so.6`.annobin_libc_start.c + 243 frame swiftlang#7: 0x000000000040106e a.out`.annobin_init.c.hot + 46 The extra ELF symbols are there due to Annobin (I did not investigate why this problem happened specifically since F-30 and not since F-28). It is due to: Symbol table '.dynsym' contains 2361 entries: Valu e Size Type Bind Vis Name 0000000000022769 5 FUNC LOCAL DEFAULT _nl_load_domain.cold 000000000002276e 0 NOTYPE LOCAL HIDDEN .annobin_abort.c.unlikely ... 000000000002276e 0 NOTYPE LOCAL HIDDEN .annobin_loadmsgcat.c_end.unlikely ... 000000000002276e 0 NOTYPE LOCAL HIDDEN .annobin_textdomain.c_end.unlikely 000000000002276e 548 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT abort 000000000002276e 548 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT abort@@GLIBC_2.2.5 000000000002276e 548 FUNC LOCAL DEFAULT __GI_abort 0000000000022992 0 NOTYPE LOCAL HIDDEN .annobin_abort.c_end.unlikely Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63540 llvm-svn: 364773 (cherry picked from commit 3f594ed)

If a core file has an EFI version string which includes a UUID (similar to what it returns for the kdp KDP_KERNELVERSION packet) in the LC_IDENT or LC_NOTE 'kern ver str' load command. In that case, we should try to find the binary and dSYM for the UUID listed. The dSYM may have python code which knows how to relocate the binary to the correct address in lldb's target section load list and loads other ancillary binaries. The test case is a little involved, 1. it compiles an inferior hello world apple (a.out), 2. it compiles a program which can create a corefile manually with a specific binary's UUID encoded in it, 3. it gets the UUID of the a.out binary, 4. it creates a shell script, dsym-for-uuid.sh, which will return the full path to the a.out + a.out.dSYM when called with teh correct UUID, 5. it sets the LLDB_APPLE_DSYMFORUUID_EXECUTABLE env var before creating the lldb target, to point to this dsym-for-uuid.sh, 6. runs the create-corefile binary we compiled in step swiftlang#2, 7. loads the corefile from step swiftlang#6 into lldb, 8. verifies that lldb loaded a.out by reading the LC_NOTE load command from the corefile, calling dsym-for-uuid.sh with that UUID, got back the path to a.out and loaded it. whew! <rdar://problem/47562911> llvm-svn: 366378 (cherry picked from commit be4be61)

Currently, clang emits subprograms for declared functions when the target debugger or DWARF standard is known to support entry values (DW_OP_entry_value & the GNU equivalent). Treat DW_AT_tail_call the same way to allow debuggers to follow cross-TU tail calls. Pre-patch debug session with a cross-TU tail call: ``` * frame #0: 0x0000000100000fa4 main`target at b.c:4:3 [opt] frame #1: 0x0000000100000f99 main`main at a.c:8:10 [opt] ``` Post-patch (note that the tail-calling frame, "helper", is visible): ``` * frame #0: 0x0000000100000fa4 main`target at b.c:4:3 [opt] frame #1: 0x0000000100000f80 main`helper [opt] [artificial] frame #2: 0x0000000100000f99 main`main at a.c:8:10 [opt] ``` rdar://46577651 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69743

…_call is understood" This caused Chromium builds to fail with "inlinable function call in a function with debug info must have a !dbg location" errors. See https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1022296#c1 for a reproducer. > Currently, clang emits subprograms for declared functions when the > target debugger or DWARF standard is known to support entry values > (DW_OP_entry_value & the GNU equivalent). > > Treat DW_AT_tail_call the same way to allow debuggers to follow cross-TU > tail calls. > > Pre-patch debug session with a cross-TU tail call: > > ``` > * frame #0: 0x0000000100000fa4 main`target at b.c:4:3 [opt] > frame #1: 0x0000000100000f99 main`main at a.c:8:10 [opt] > ``` > > Post-patch (note that the tail-calling frame, "helper", is visible): > > ``` > * frame #0: 0x0000000100000fa4 main`target at b.c:4:3 [opt] > frame #1: 0x0000000100000f80 main`helper [opt] [artificial] > frame #2: 0x0000000100000f99 main`main at a.c:8:10 [opt] > ``` > > rdar://46577651 > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69743

During register coalescing, we update the live-intervals on-the-fly. To do that we are in this strange mode where the live-intervals can be slightly out-of-sync (more precisely they are forward looking) compared to what the IR actually represents. This happens because the register coalescer only updates the IR when it is done with updating the live-intervals and it has to do it this way because updating the IR on-the-fly would actually clobber some information on how the live-ranges that are being updated look like. This is problematic for updates that rely on the IR to accurately represents the state of the live-ranges. Right now, we have only one of those: stripValuesNotDefiningMask. To reconcile this need of out-of-sync IR, this patch introduces a new argument to LiveInterval::refineSubRanges that allows the code doing the live range updates to reason about how the code should look like after the coalescer will have rewritten the registers. Essentially this captures how a subregister index with be offseted to match its position in a new register class. E.g., let say we want to merge: V1.sub1:<2 x s32> = COPY V2.sub3:<4 x s32> We do that by choosing a class where sub1:<2 x s32> and sub3:<4 x s32> overlap, i.e., by choosing a class where we can find "offset + 1 == 3". Put differently we align V2's sub3 with V1's sub1: V2: sub0 sub1 sub2 sub3 V1: <offset> sub0 sub1 This offset will look like a composed subregidx in the the class: V1.(composed sub2 with sub1):<4 x s32> = COPY V2.sub3:<4 x s32> => V1.(composed sub2 with sub1):<4 x s32> = COPY V2.sub3:<4 x s32> Now if we didn't rewrite the uses and def of V1, all the checks for V1 need to account for this offset to match what the live intervals intend to capture. Prior to this patch, we would fail to recognize the uses and def of V1 and would end up with machine verifier errors: No live segment at def. This could lead to miscompile as we would drop some live-ranges and thus, miss some interferences. For this problem to trigger, we need to reach stripValuesNotDefiningMask while having a mismatch between the IR and the live-ranges (i.e., we have to apply a subreg offset to the IR.) This requires the following three conditions: 1. An update of overlapping subreg lanes: e.g., dsub0 == <ssub0, ssub1> 2. An update with Tuple registers with a possibility to coalesce the subreg index: e.g., v1.dsub_1 == v2.dsub_3 3. Subreg liveness enabled. looking at the IR to decide what is alive and what is not, i.e., calling stripValuesNotDefiningMask. coalescer maintains for the live-ranges information. None of the targets that currently use subreg liveness (i.e., the targets that fulfill #3, Hexagon, AMDGPU, PowerPC, and SystemZ IIRC) expose #1 and and #2, so this patch also artificial enables subreg liveness for ARM, so that a nice test case can be attached.

…ood (reland with fixes) Currently, clang emits subprograms for declared functions when the target debugger or DWARF standard is known to support entry values (DW_OP_entry_value & the GNU equivalent). Treat DW_AT_tail_call the same way to allow debuggers to follow cross-TU tail calls. Pre-patch debug session with a cross-TU tail call: ``` * frame #0: 0x0000000100000fa4 main`target at b.c:4:3 [opt] frame #1: 0x0000000100000f99 main`main at a.c:8:10 [opt] ``` Post-patch (note that the tail-calling frame, "helper", is visible): ``` * frame #0: 0x0000000100000fa4 main`target at b.c:4:3 [opt] frame #1: 0x0000000100000f80 main`helper [opt] [artificial] frame #2: 0x0000000100000f99 main`main at a.c:8:10 [opt] ``` This was reverted in 5b9a072 because it attached declaration subprograms to inlinable builtin calls, which interacted badly with the MergeICmps pass. The fix is to not attach declarations to builtins. rdar://46577651 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69743

…outlined functions" This reverts commit cec2d5c. Reverting because this is still creating outlined functions with return address signing instructions with mismatches SP values. For example: int *volatile v; void foo(int x) { int a[x]; v = &a[0]; v = &a[0]; v = &a[0]; v = &a[0]; v = &a[0]; v = &a[0]; } void bar(int x) { int a[x]; v = 0; v = &a[0]; v = &a[0]; v = &a[0]; v = &a[0]; v = &a[0]; } This generates these two outlined functions, both of which modify SP between the paciasp and retaa instructions: $ clang --target=aarch64-arm-none-eabi -march=armv8.3-a -c test2.c -o - -S -Oz -mbranch-protection=pac-ret+leaf ... OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0: // @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0 .cfi_sections .debug_frame .cfi_startproc // %bb.0: paciasp .cfi_negate_ra_state mov w8, w0 lsl x8, x8, #2 add x8, x8, #15 // =15 mov x9, sp and x8, x8, #0x7fffffff0 sub x8, x9, x8 mov x29, sp mov sp, x8 adrp x9, v retaa ... OUTLINED_FUNCTION_1: // @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_1 .cfi_startproc // %bb.0: paciasp .cfi_negate_ra_state str x8, [x9, :lo12:v] str x8, [x9, :lo12:v] str x8, [x9, :lo12:v] str x8, [x9, :lo12:v] str x8, [x9, :lo12:v] mov sp, x29 retaa

…F optimizing part. #2. Summary: This patch relands D71271. The problem with D71271 is that it has cyclic dependency: CodeGen->AsmPrinter->DebugInfoDWARF->CodeGen. To avoid cyclic dependency this patch puts implementation for DWARFOptimizer into separate library: lib/DWARFLinker. Thus the difference between this patch and D71271 is in that DWARFOptimizer renamed into DWARFLinker and it`s files are put into lib/DWARFLinker. Reviewers: JDevlieghere, friss, dblaikie, aprantl Reviewed By: JDevlieghere Subscribers: thegameg, merge_guards_bot, probinson, mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm, #debug-info Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71839

…t binding This fixes a failing testcase on Fedora 30 x86_64 (regression Fedora 29->30): PASS: ./bin/lldb ./lldb-test-build.noindex/functionalities/unwind/noreturn/TestNoreturnUnwind.test_dwarf/a.out -o 'settings set symbols.enable-external-lookup false' -o r -o bt -o quit * frame #0: 0x00007ffff7aa6e75 libc.so.6`__GI_raise + 325 frame #1: 0x00007ffff7a91895 libc.so.6`__GI_abort + 295 frame #2: 0x0000000000401140 a.out`func_c at main.c:12:2 frame #3: 0x000000000040113a a.out`func_b at main.c:18:2 frame #4: 0x0000000000401134 a.out`func_a at main.c:26:2 frame #5: 0x000000000040112e a.out`main(argc=<unavailable>, argv=<unavailable>) at main.c:32:2 frame #6: 0x00007ffff7a92f33 libc.so.6`__libc_start_main + 243 frame #7: 0x000000000040106e a.out`_start + 46 vs. FAIL - unrecognized abort() function: ./bin/lldb ./lldb-test-build.noindex/functionalities/unwind/noreturn/TestNoreturnUnwind.test_dwarf/a.out -o 'settings set symbols.enable-external-lookup false' -o r -o bt -o quit * frame #0: 0x00007ffff7aa6e75 libc.so.6`.annobin_raise.c + 325 frame #1: 0x00007ffff7a91895 libc.so.6`.annobin_loadmsgcat.c_end.unlikely + 295 frame #2: 0x0000000000401140 a.out`func_c at main.c:12:2 frame #3: 0x000000000040113a a.out`func_b at main.c:18:2 frame #4: 0x0000000000401134 a.out`func_a at main.c:26:2 frame #5: 0x000000000040112e a.out`main(argc=<unavailable>, argv=<unavailable>) at main.c:32:2 frame #6: 0x00007ffff7a92f33 libc.so.6`.annobin_libc_start.c + 243 frame #7: 0x000000000040106e a.out`.annobin_init.c.hot + 46 The extra ELF symbols are there due to Annobin (I did not investigate why this problem happened specifically since F-30 and not since F-28). It is due to: Symbol table '.dynsym' contains 2361 entries: Valu e Size Type Bind Vis Name 0000000000022769 5 FUNC LOCAL DEFAULT _nl_load_domain.cold 000000000002276e 0 NOTYPE LOCAL HIDDEN .annobin_abort.c.unlikely ... 000000000002276e 0 NOTYPE LOCAL HIDDEN .annobin_loadmsgcat.c_end.unlikely ... 000000000002276e 0 NOTYPE LOCAL HIDDEN .annobin_textdomain.c_end.unlikely 000000000002276e 548 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT abort 000000000002276e 548 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT abort@@GLIBC_2.2.5 000000000002276e 548 FUNC LOCAL DEFAULT __GI_abort 0000000000022992 0 NOTYPE LOCAL HIDDEN .annobin_abort.c_end.unlikely GDB has some more complicated preferences between overlapping and/or sharing address symbols, I have made here so far the most simple fix for this case. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63540

The test is currently failing on some systems with ASAN enabled due to: ``` ==22898==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x603000003da4 at pc 0x00010951c33d bp 0x7ffee6709e00 sp 0x7ffee67095c0 READ of size 5 at 0x603000003da4 thread T0 #0 0x10951c33c in wrap_memmove+0x16c (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:x86_64+0x1833c) #1 0x7fff4a327f57 in CFDataReplaceBytes+0x1ba (CoreFoundation:x86_64+0x13f57) #2 0x7fff4a415a44 in __CFDataInit+0x2db (CoreFoundation:x86_64+0x101a44) #3 0x1094f8490 in main main.m:424 #4 0x7fff77482084 in start+0x0 (libdyld.dylib:x86_64+0x17084) 0x603000003da4 is located 0 bytes to the right of 20-byte region [0x603000003d90,0x603000003da4) allocated by thread T0 here: #0 0x109547c02 in wrap_calloc+0xa2 (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:x86_64+0x43c02) #1 0x7fff763ad3ef in class_createInstance+0x52 (libobjc.A.dylib:x86_64+0x73ef) #2 0x7fff4c6b2d73 in NSAllocateObject+0x12 (Foundation:x86_64+0x1d73) #3 0x7fff4c6b5e5f in -[_NSPlaceholderData initWithBytes:length:copy:deallocator:]+0x40 (Foundation:x86_64+0x4e5f) #4 0x7fff4c6d4cf1 in -[NSData(NSData) initWithBytes:length:]+0x24 (Foundation:x86_64+0x23cf1) #5 0x1094f8245 in main main.m:404 #6 0x7fff77482084 in start+0x0 (libdyld.dylib:x86_64+0x17084) ``` The reason is that we create a string "HELLO" but get the size wrong (it's 5 bytes instead of 4). Later on we read the buffer and pretend it is 5 bytes long, causing an OOB read which ASAN detects. In general this test probably needs some cleanup as it produces on macOS 10.15 around 100 compiler warnings which isn't great, but let's first get the bot green.

This reverts commit e57a9ab. Parser/cxx2a-placeholder-type-constraint.cpp has MSan failures. Present at 7b81c3f: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/builds/17133/steps/check-clang%20msan/logs/stdio not present at eaa594f: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/builds/17132/steps/check-clang%20msan/logs/stdio Stack trace: ``` ==57032==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0xccfe016 in clang::AutoTypeLoc::getLocalSourceRange() const /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/include/clang/AST/TypeLoc.h:2036:19 #1 0xcc56758 in CheckDeducedPlaceholderConstraints(clang::Sema&, clang::AutoType const&, clang::AutoTypeLoc, clang::QualType) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateDeduction.cpp:4505:56 #2 0xcc550ce in clang::Sema::DeduceAutoType(clang::TypeLoc, clang::Expr*&, clang::QualType&, llvm::Optional<unsigned int>, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateDeduction.cpp:4707:11 #3 0xcc52407 in clang::Sema::DeduceAutoType(clang::TypeSourceInfo*, clang::Expr*&, clang::QualType&, llvm::Optional<unsigned int>, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateDeduction.cpp:4457:10 #4 0xba38332 in clang::Sema::deduceVarTypeFromInitializer(clang::VarDecl*, clang::DeclarationName, clang::QualType, clang::TypeSourceInfo*, clang::SourceRange, bool, clang::Expr*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:11351:7 #5 0xba3a8a9 in clang::Sema::DeduceVariableDeclarationType(clang::VarDecl*, bool, clang::Expr*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:11385:26 #6 0xba3c520 in clang::Sema::AddInitializerToDecl(clang::Decl*, clang::Expr*, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:11725:9 #7 0xb39c498 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclarationAfterDeclaratorAndAttributes(clang::Declarator&, clang::Parser::ParsedTemplateInfo const&, clang::Parser::ForRangeInit*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:2399:17 #8 0xb394d80 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclGroup(clang::ParsingDeclSpec&, clang::DeclaratorContext, clang::SourceLocation*, clang::Parser::ForRangeInit*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:2128:21 #9 0xb383bbf in clang::Parser::ParseSimpleDeclaration(clang::DeclaratorContext, clang::SourceLocation&, clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, bool, clang::Parser::ForRangeInit*, clang::SourceLocation*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:1848:10 #10 0xb383129 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclaration(clang::DeclaratorContext, clang::SourceLocation&, clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, clang::SourceLocation*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/PointerUnion.h #11 0xb53a388 in clang::Parser::ParseStatementOrDeclarationAfterAttributes(llvm::SmallVector<clang::Stmt*, 32u>&, clang::Parser::ParsedStmtContext, clang::SourceLocation*, clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp:221:13 #12 0xb539309 in clang::Parser::ParseStatementOrDeclaration(llvm::SmallVector<clang::Stmt*, 32u>&, clang::Parser::ParsedStmtContext, clang::SourceLocation*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp:106:20 #13 0xb55610e in clang::Parser::ParseCompoundStatementBody(bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp:1079:11 #14 0xb559529 in clang::Parser::ParseFunctionStatementBody(clang::Decl*, clang::Parser::ParseScope&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp:2204:21 #15 0xb33c13e in clang::Parser::ParseFunctionDefinition(clang::ParsingDeclarator&, clang::Parser::ParsedTemplateInfo const&, clang::Parser::LateParsedAttrList*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1339:10 #16 0xb394703 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclGroup(clang::ParsingDeclSpec&, clang::DeclaratorContext, clang::SourceLocation*, clang::Parser::ForRangeInit*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:2068:11 #17 0xb338e52 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclOrFunctionDefInternal(clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec&, clang::AccessSpecifier) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1099:10 #18 0xb337674 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclarationOrFunctionDefinition(clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec*, clang::AccessSpecifier) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1115:12 #19 0xb334a96 in clang::Parser::ParseExternalDeclaration(clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:935:12 #20 0xb32f12a in clang::Parser::ParseTopLevelDecl(clang::OpaquePtr<clang::DeclGroupRef>&, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:686:12 #21 0xb31e193 in clang::ParseAST(clang::Sema&, bool, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseAST.cpp:158:20 #22 0x80263f0 in clang::FrontendAction::Execute() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:936:8 #23 0x7f2a257 in clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:965:33 #24 0x8288bef in clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/FrontendTool/ExecuteCompilerInvocation.cpp:290:25 #25 0xad44c2 in cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp:239:15 #26 0xacd76a in ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:325:12 #27 0xacc9fd in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:398:12 #28 0x7f7d82cdb2e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0) #29 0xa4dde9 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/clang-11+0xa4dde9) ```

Using the same strategy as c38e425. D69825 revealed (introduced?) a problem when building with ASan, and some memory leaks somewhere. More details are available in the original patch. Looks like we missed one failing tests, this patch adds the workaround to this test as well.

Using the same strategy as c38e425. D69825 revealed (introduced?) a problem when building with ASan, and some memory leaks somewhere. More details are available in the original patch. Looks like we missed one failing tests, this patch adds the workaround to this test as well. (cherry picked from commit e174da4)

…itions This is a revert-of-revert (i.e. this reverts commit 802bec8, which itself reverted fa4701e and 79daafc) with a fix folded in. The problem was that call site tags weren't emitted properly when LTO was enabled along with split-dwarf. This required a minor fix. I've added a reduced test case in test/DebugInfo/X86/fission-call-site.ll. Original commit message: This allows a call site tag in CU A to reference a callee DIE in CU B without resorting to creating an incomplete duplicate DIE for the callee inside of CU A. We already allow cross-CU references of subprogram declarations, so it doesn't seem like definitions ought to be special. This improves entry value evaluation and tail call frame synthesis in the LTO setting. During LTO, it's common for cross-module inlining to produce a call in some CU A where the callee resides in a different CU, and there is no declaration subprogram for the callee anywhere. In this case llvm would (unnecessarily, I think) emit an empty DW_TAG_subprogram in order to fill in the call site tag. That empty 'definition' defeats entry value evaluation etc., because the debugger can't figure out what it means. As a follow-up, maybe we could add a DWARF verifier check that a DW_TAG_subprogram at least has a DW_AT_name attribute. Update #1: Reland with a fix to create a declaration DIE when the declaration is missing from the CU's retainedTypes list. The declaration is left out of the retainedTypes list in two cases: 1) Re-compiling pre-r266445 bitcode (in which declarations weren't added to the retainedTypes list), and 2) Doing LTO function importing (which doesn't update the retainedTypes list). It's possible to handle (1) and (2) by modifying the retainedTypes list (in AutoUpgrade, or in the LTO importing logic resp.), but I don't see an advantage to doing it this way, as it would cause more DWARF to be emitted compared to creating the declaration DIEs lazily. Update swiftlang#2: Fold in a fix for call site tag emission in the split-dwarf + LTO case. Tested with a stage2 ThinLTO+RelWithDebInfo build of clang, and with a ReleaseLTO-g build of the test suite. rdar://46577651, rdar://57855316, rdar://57840415, rdar://58888440 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70350 (cherry picked from commit e08f205)

…itions This is a revert-of-revert (i.e. this reverts commit 802bec8, which itself reverted fa4701e and 79daafc) with a fix folded in. The problem was that call site tags weren't emitted properly when LTO was enabled along with split-dwarf. This required a minor fix. I've added a reduced test case in test/DebugInfo/X86/fission-call-site.ll. Original commit message: This allows a call site tag in CU A to reference a callee DIE in CU B without resorting to creating an incomplete duplicate DIE for the callee inside of CU A. We already allow cross-CU references of subprogram declarations, so it doesn't seem like definitions ought to be special. This improves entry value evaluation and tail call frame synthesis in the LTO setting. During LTO, it's common for cross-module inlining to produce a call in some CU A where the callee resides in a different CU, and there is no declaration subprogram for the callee anywhere. In this case llvm would (unnecessarily, I think) emit an empty DW_TAG_subprogram in order to fill in the call site tag. That empty 'definition' defeats entry value evaluation etc., because the debugger can't figure out what it means. As a follow-up, maybe we could add a DWARF verifier check that a DW_TAG_subprogram at least has a DW_AT_name attribute. Update #1: Reland with a fix to create a declaration DIE when the declaration is missing from the CU's retainedTypes list. The declaration is left out of the retainedTypes list in two cases: 1) Re-compiling pre-r266445 bitcode (in which declarations weren't added to the retainedTypes list), and 2) Doing LTO function importing (which doesn't update the retainedTypes list). It's possible to handle (1) and (2) by modifying the retainedTypes list (in AutoUpgrade, or in the LTO importing logic resp.), but I don't see an advantage to doing it this way, as it would cause more DWARF to be emitted compared to creating the declaration DIEs lazily. Update #2: Fold in a fix for call site tag emission in the split-dwarf + LTO case. Tested with a stage2 ThinLTO+RelWithDebInfo build of clang, and with a ReleaseLTO-g build of the test suite. rdar://46577651, rdar://57855316, rdar://57840415, rdar://58888440 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70350

After a first attempt to fix the test-suite failures, my first recommit caused the same failures again. I had updated CMakeList.txt files of tests that needed -fcommon, but it turns out that there are also Makefiles which are used by some bots, so I've updated these Makefiles now too. See the original commit message for more details on this change: 0a9fc92

This reverts commit dfecec6. Merging the change revealed that there is a failure on the memory sanitizer bots. Command Output (stderr): -- ==3569==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0x1d71bff in llvm::AVRSubtarget::ParseSubtargetFeatures(llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/lib/Target/AVR/AVRGenSubtargetInfo.inc:471:7 #1 0x1d721f8 in initializeSubtargetDependencies /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AVR/AVRSubtarget.cpp:50:3 #2 0x1d721f8 in llvm::AVRSubtarget::AVRSubtarget(llvm::Triple const&, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char> > const&, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char> > const&, llvm::AVRTargetMachine const&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AVR/AVRSubtarget.cpp:33:18 #3 0x1d3077f in llvm::AVRTargetMachine::AVRTargetMachine(llvm::Target const&, llvm::Triple const&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, llvm::TargetOptions const&, llvm::Optional<llvm::Reloc::Model>, llvm::Optional<llvm::CodeModel::Model>, llvm::CodeGenOpt::Level, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AVR/AVRTargetMachine.cpp:52:7 #4 0x1d3169d in llvm::RegisterTargetMachine<llvm::AVRTargetMachine>::Allocator(llvm::Target const&, llvm::Triple const&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, llvm::TargetOptions const&, llvm::Optional<llvm::Reloc::Model>, llvm::Optional<llvm::CodeModel::Model>, llvm::CodeGenOpt::Level, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/TargetRegistry.h:1121:16 #5 0x86662f in createTargetMachine /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/TargetRegistry.h:402:12 #6 0x86662f in compileModule(char**, llvm::LLVMContext&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:473:52 #7 0x861f42 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:356:22 #8 0x7f76f7b072e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0) #9 0x7ebbc9 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/llc+0x7ebbc9) SUMMARY: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/lib/Target/AVR/AVRGenSubtargetInfo.inc:471:7 in llvm::AVRSubtarget::ParseSubtargetFeatures(llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) Exiting FileCheck error: '<stdin>' is empty. -- The patch wiill be re-committed once fixed.

Summary: When moving add and sub to memory operand instructions, aarch64-ldst-opt would prematurally pop the stack pointer, before memory instructions that do access the stack using indirect loads. e.g. ``` int foo(int offset){ int local[4] = {0}; return local[offset]; } ``` would generate: ``` sub sp, sp, #16 ; Push the stack mov x8, sp ; Save stack in register stp xzr, xzr, [sp], #16 ; Zero initialize stack, and post-increment, making it invalid ------ If an exception goes here, the stack value might be corrupted ldr w0, [x8, w0, sxtw #2] ; Access correct position, but it is not guarded by SP ``` Reviewers: fhahn, foad, thegameg, eli.friedman, efriedma Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: efriedma, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, danielkiss, llvm-commits, simon_tatham Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75755

Saves only 36 includes of ASTContext.h and related headers. There are two deps on ASTContext.h: - C++ method overrides iterator types (TinyPtrVector) - getting LangOptions For #1, duplicate the iterator type, which is TinyPtrVector<>::const_iterator. For #2, add an out-of-line accessor to get the language options. Getting the ASTContext from a Decl is already an out of line method that loops over the parent DeclContexts, so if it is ever performance critical, the proper fix is to pass the context (or LangOpts) into the predicate in question. Other changes are just header fixups.

Summary: Previously `AtosSymbolizer` would set the PID to examine in the constructor which is called early on during sanitizer init. This can lead to incorrect behaviour in the case of a fork() because if the symbolizer is launched in the child it will be told examine the parent process rather than the child. To fix this the PID is determined just before the symbolizer is launched. A test case is included that triggers the buggy behaviour that existed prior to this patch. The test observes the PID that `atos` was called on. It also examines the symbolized stacktrace. Prior to this patch `atos` failed to symbolize the stacktrace giving output that looked like... ``` #0 0x100fc3bb5 in __sanitizer_print_stack_trace asan_stack.cpp:86 #1 0x10490dd36 in PrintStack+0x56 (/path/to/print-stack-trace-in-code-loaded-after-fork.cpp.tmp_shared_lib.dylib:x86_64+0xd36) #2 0x100f6f986 in main+0x4a6 (/path/to/print-stack-trace-in-code-loaded-after-fork.cpp.tmp_loader:x86_64+0x100001986) #3 0x7fff714f1cc8 in start+0x0 (/usr/lib/system/libdyld.dylib:x86_64+0x1acc8) ``` After this patch stackframes `#1` and `#2` are fully symbolized. This patch is also a pre-requisite refactor for rdar://problem/58789439. Reviewers: kubamracek, yln Subscribers: #sanitizers, llvm-commits Tags: #sanitizers Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77623

Summary: Previously `AtosSymbolizer` would set the PID to examine in the constructor which is called early on during sanitizer init. This can lead to incorrect behaviour in the case of a fork() because if the symbolizer is launched in the child it will be told examine the parent process rather than the child. To fix this the PID is determined just before the symbolizer is launched. A test case is included that triggers the buggy behaviour that existed prior to this patch. The test observes the PID that `atos` was called on. It also examines the symbolized stacktrace. Prior to this patch `atos` failed to symbolize the stacktrace giving output that looked like... ``` #0 0x100fc3bb5 in __sanitizer_print_stack_trace asan_stack.cpp:86 swiftlang#1 0x10490dd36 in PrintStack+0x56 (/path/to/print-stack-trace-in-code-loaded-after-fork.cpp.tmp_shared_lib.dylib:x86_64+0xd36) swiftlang#2 0x100f6f986 in main+0x4a6 (/path/to/print-stack-trace-in-code-loaded-after-fork.cpp.tmp_loader:x86_64+0x100001986) swiftlang#3 0x7fff714f1cc8 in start+0x0 (/usr/lib/system/libdyld.dylib:x86_64+0x1acc8) ``` After this patch stackframes `swiftlang#1` and `swiftlang#2` are fully symbolized. This patch is also a pre-requisite refactor for rdar://problem/58789439. Reviewers: kubamracek, yln Subscribers: #sanitizers, llvm-commits Tags: #sanitizers Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77623 (cherry picked from commit 8efc3cc)

Summary: crash stack: ``` lang: tools/clang/include/clang/AST/AttrImpl.inc:1490: unsigned int clang::AlignedAttr::getAlignment(clang::ASTContext &) const: Assertion `!isAlignmentDependent()' failed. PLEASE submit a bug report to https://bugs.llvm.org/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: ./bin/clang -cc1 -std=c++1y -ast-dump -frecovery-ast -fcxx-exceptions /tmp/t4.cpp 1. /tmp/t4.cpp:3:31: current parser token ';' #0 0x0000000002530cff llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:564:13 #1 0x000000000252ee30 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:69:18 #2 0x000000000253126c SignalHandler(int) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:396:3 #3 0x00007f86964d0520 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x13520) #4 0x00007f8695f9ff61 raise /build/glibc-oCLvUT/glibc-2.29/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51:1 #5 0x00007f8695f8b535 abort /build/glibc-oCLvUT/glibc-2.29/stdlib/abort.c:81:7 #6 0x00007f8695f8b40f _nl_load_domain /build/glibc-oCLvUT/glibc-2.29/intl/loadmsgcat.c:1177:9 #7 0x00007f8695f98b92 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x32b92) #8 0x0000000004503d9f llvm::APInt::getZExtValue() const llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:1623:5 #9 0x0000000004503d9f clang::AlignedAttr::getAlignment(clang::ASTContext&) const llvm-project/build/tools/clang/include/clang/AST/AttrImpl.inc:1492:0 ``` Reviewers: sammccall Subscribers: cfe-commits Tags: #clang Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78085

Bitcode file alignment is only 32-bit so 64-bit offsets need special handling. /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:6327:28: runtime error: load of misaligned address 0x7fca2bcfe54c for type 'const uint64_t' (aka 'const unsigned long'), which requires 8 byte alignment 0x7fca2bcfe54c: note: pointer points here 00 00 00 00 5a a6 01 00 00 00 00 00 19 a7 01 00 00 00 00 00 48 a7 01 00 00 00 00 00 7d a7 01 00 ^ #0 0x3be2fe4 in clang::ASTReader::TypeCursorForIndex(unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:6327:28 #1 0x3be30a0 in clang::ASTReader::readTypeRecord(unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:6348:24 #2 0x3bd3d4a in clang::ASTReader::GetType(unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:6985:26 #3 0x3c5d9ae in clang::ASTDeclReader::Visit(clang::Decl*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReaderDecl.cpp:533:31 #4 0x3c91cac in clang::ASTReader::ReadDeclRecord(unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReaderDecl.cpp:4045:10 #5 0x3bd4fb1 in clang::ASTReader::GetDecl(unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:7352:5 #6 0x3bce2f9 in clang::ASTReader::ReadASTBlock(clang::serialization::ModuleFile&, unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:3625:22 #7 0x3bd6d75 in clang::ASTReader::ReadAST(llvm::StringRef, clang::serialization::ModuleKind, clang::SourceLocation, unsigned int, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<clang::ASTReader::ImportedSubmodule>*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:4230:32 #8 0x3a6b415 in clang::CompilerInstance::createPCHExternalASTSource(llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, bool, bool, clang::Preprocessor&, clang::InMemoryModuleCache&, clang::ASTContext&, clang::PCHContainerReader const&, llvm::ArrayRef<std::shared_ptr<clang::ModuleFileExtension> >, llvm::ArrayRef<std::shared_ptr<clang::DependencyCollector> >, void*, bool, bool, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:539:19 #9 0x3a6b00e in clang::CompilerInstance::createPCHExternalASTSource(llvm::StringRef, bool, bool, void*, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:501:18 #10 0x3abac80 in clang::FrontendAction::BeginSourceFile(clang::CompilerInstance&, clang::FrontendInputFile const&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:865:12 #11 0x3a6e61c in clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:972:13 #12 0x3ba74bf in clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/FrontendTool/ExecuteCompilerInvocation.cpp:282:25 #13 0xa3f753 in cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp:240:15 #14 0xa3a68a in ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char const*>&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:330:12 #15 0xa37f31 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:407:12 #16 0x7fca2a7032e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0) #17 0xa21029 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/clang-11+0xa21029) This reverts commit 30d5946.

Summary: For some reason the TestExec test on the macOS bots randomly fails with this error: ``` output: * thread #2, stop reason = EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x108e66000) * frame #0: 0x0000000108e66000 [...] File "/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/exec/TestExec.py", line 25, in test_hitting_exec self.do_test(False) File "/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/exec/TestExec.py", line 113, in do_test "Stopped at breakpoint in exec'ed process.") AssertionError: False is not True : Stopped at breakpoint in exec'ed process. Config=x86_64-/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/bin/clang-11 ``` I don't know why the test program is failing and I couldn't reproduce this problem on my own. This patch is a stab in the dark that just tries to make the test code more similar to code which we would expect in a user program to make whatever part of macOS happy that is currently not liking our code. The actual changes are: * We pass in argv[0] that is describing otherprog path instead of the current argv[0]. * We pass in a non-null envp (which anyway doesn't seem to be allowed on macOS man page). Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere Reviewed By: labath Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75241

…linux (llvm#99613) Examples of the output: ARM: ``` # ./a.out AddressSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL ================================================================= ==122==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x0000007a (pc 0x76e13ac0 bp 0x7eb7fd00 sp 0x7eb7fcc8 T0) ==122==The signal is caused by a READ memory access. ==122==Hint: address points to the zero page. #0 0x76e13ac0 (/lib/libc.so.6+0x7cac0) #1 0x76dce680 in gsignal (/lib/libc.so.6+0x37680) #2 0x005c2250 (/root/a.out+0x145250) #3 0x76db982c (/lib/libc.so.6+0x2282c) #4 0x76db9918 in __libc_start_main (/lib/libc.so.6+0x22918) ==122==Register values: r0 = 0x00000000 r1 = 0x0000007a r2 = 0x0000000b r3 = 0x76d95020 r4 = 0x0000007a r5 = 0x00000001 r6 = 0x005dcc5c r7 = 0x0000010c r8 = 0x0000000b r9 = 0x76f9ece0 r10 = 0x00000000 r11 = 0x7eb7fd00 r12 = 0x76dce670 sp = 0x7eb7fcc8 lr = 0x76e13ab4 pc = 0x76e13ac0 AddressSanitizer can not provide additional info. SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: SEGV (/lib/libc.so.6+0x7cac0) ==122==ABORTING ``` AArch64: ``` # ./a.out UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL ==99==ERROR: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x000000000063 (pc 0x007fbbbc5860 bp 0x007fcfdcb700 sp 0x007fcfdcb700 T99) ==99==The signal is caused by a UNKNOWN memory access. ==99==Hint: address points to the zero page. #0 0x007fbbbc5860 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x82860) #1 0x007fbbb81578 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x3e578) #2 0x00556051152c (/root/a.out+0x3152c) #3 0x007fbbb6e268 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x2b268) #4 0x007fbbb6e344 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x2b344) #5 0x0055604e45ec (/root/a.out+0x45ec) ==99==Register values: x0 = 0x0000000000000000 x1 = 0x0000000000000063 x2 = 0x000000000000000b x3 = 0x0000007fbbb41440 x4 = 0x0000007fbbb41580 x5 = 0x3669288942d44cce x6 = 0x0000000000000000 x7 = 0x00000055605110b0 x8 = 0x0000000000000083 x9 = 0x0000000000000000 x10 = 0x0000000000000000 x11 = 0x0000000000000000 x12 = 0x0000007fbbdb3360 x13 = 0x0000000000010000 x14 = 0x0000000000000039 x15 = 0x00000000004113a0 x16 = 0x0000007fbbb81560 x17 = 0x0000005560540138 x18 = 0x000000006474e552 x19 = 0x0000000000000063 x20 = 0x0000000000000001 x21 = 0x000000000000000b x22 = 0x0000005560511510 x23 = 0x0000007fcfdcb918 x24 = 0x0000007fbbdb1b50 x25 = 0x0000000000000000 x26 = 0x0000007fbbdb2000 x27 = 0x000000556053f858 x28 = 0x0000000000000000 fp = 0x0000007fcfdcb700 lr = 0x0000007fbbbc584c sp = 0x0000007fcfdcb700 UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer can not provide additional info. SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: SEGV (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x82860) ==99==ABORTING ```

``` UBSan-Standalone-sparc :: TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp ``` `FAIL`s on 32 and 64-bit Linux/sparc64 (and on Solaris/sparcv9, too: the test isn't Linux-specific at all). With `UBSAN_OPTIONS=fast_unwind_on_fatal=1`, the stack trace shows a duplicate innermost frame: ``` compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:14:31: runtime error: execution reached the end of a value-returning function without returning a value #0 0x7003a708 in f() compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:14:35 #1 0x7003a708 in f() compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:14:35 #2 0x7003a714 in g() compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:17:38 ``` which isn't seen with `fast_unwind_on_fatal=0`. This turns out to be another fallout from fixing `__builtin_return_address`/`__builtin_extract_return_addr` on SPARC. In `sanitizer_stacktrace_sparc.cpp` (`BufferedStackTrace::UnwindFast`) the `pc` arg is the return address, while `pc1` from the stack frame (`fr_savpc`) is the address of the `call` insn, leading to a double entry for the innermost frame in `trace_buffer[]`. This patch fixes this by moving the adjustment before all uses. Tested on `sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu` and `sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11` (with the `ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux` tests enabled).

``` UBSan-Standalone-sparc :: TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp ``` `FAIL`s on 32 and 64-bit Linux/sparc64 (and on Solaris/sparcv9, too: the test isn't Linux-specific at all). With `UBSAN_OPTIONS=fast_unwind_on_fatal=1`, the stack trace shows a duplicate innermost frame: ``` compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:14:31: runtime error: execution reached the end of a value-returning function without returning a value #0 0x7003a708 in f() compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:14:35 #1 0x7003a708 in f() compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:14:35 #2 0x7003a714 in g() compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:17:38 ``` which isn't seen with `fast_unwind_on_fatal=0`. This turns out to be another fallout from fixing `__builtin_return_address`/`__builtin_extract_return_addr` on SPARC. In `sanitizer_stacktrace_sparc.cpp` (`BufferedStackTrace::UnwindFast`) the `pc` arg is the return address, while `pc1` from the stack frame (`fr_savpc`) is the address of the `call` insn, leading to a double entry for the innermost frame in `trace_buffer[]`. This patch fixes this by moving the adjustment before all uses. Tested on `sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu` and `sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11` (with the `ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux` tests enabled). (cherry picked from commit 3368a32)

…lvm#104148) `hasOperands` does not always execute matchers in the order they are written. This can cause issue in code using bindings when one operand matcher is relying on a binding set by the other. With this change, the first matcher present in the code is always executed first and any binding it sets are available to the second matcher. Simple example with current version (1 match) and new version (2 matches): ```bash > cat tmp.cpp int a = 13; int b = ((int) a) - a; int c = a - ((int) a); > clang-query tmp.cpp clang-query> set traversal IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource clang-query> m binaryOperator(hasOperands(cStyleCastExpr(has(declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl().bind("d"))))), declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl(equalsBoundNode("d")))))) Match #1: tmp.cpp:1:1: note: "d" binds here int a = 13; ^~~~~~~~~~ tmp.cpp:2:9: note: "root" binds here int b = ((int)a) - a; ^~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 match. > ./build/bin/clang-query tmp.cpp clang-query> set traversal IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource clang-query> m binaryOperator(hasOperands(cStyleCastExpr(has(declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl().bind("d"))))), declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl(equalsBoundNode("d")))))) Match #1: tmp.cpp:1:1: note: "d" binds here 1 | int a = 13; | ^~~~~~~~~~ tmp.cpp:2:9: note: "root" binds here 2 | int b = ((int)a) - a; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ Match #2: tmp.cpp:1:1: note: "d" binds here 1 | int a = 13; | ^~~~~~~~~~ tmp.cpp:3:9: note: "root" binds here 3 | int c = a - ((int)a); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ 2 matches. ``` If this should be documented or regression tested anywhere please let me know where.

…104523) Compilers and language runtimes often use helper functions that are fundamentally uninteresting when debugging anything but the compiler/runtime itself. This patch introduces a user-extensible mechanism that allows for these frames to be hidden from backtraces and automatically skipped over when navigating the stack with `up` and `down`. This does not affect the numbering of frames, so `f <N>` will still provide access to the hidden frames. The `bt` output will also print a hint that frames have been hidden. My primary motivation for this feature is to hide thunks in the Swift programming language, but I'm including an example recognizer for `std::function::operator()` that I wished for myself many times while debugging LLDB. rdar://126629381 Example output. (Yes, my proof-of-concept recognizer could hide even more frames if we had a method that returned the function name without the return type or I used something that isn't based off regex, but it's really only meant as an example). before: ``` (lldb) thread backtrace --filtered=false * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame #3: 0x0000000100003968 a.out`std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff280, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:171:12 frame #4: 0x00000001000026bc a.out`std::__1::__function::__func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()(this=0x000000016fdff278, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:313:10 frame #5: 0x0000000100003c38 a.out`std::__1::__function::__value_func<int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff278, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) const at function.h:430:12 frame #6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame #7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame #8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 (lldb) ``` after ``` (lldb) bt * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame #6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame #7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame #8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 Note: Some frames were hidden by frame recognizers ```

…104523) Compilers and language runtimes often use helper functions that are fundamentally uninteresting when debugging anything but the compiler/runtime itself. This patch introduces a user-extensible mechanism that allows for these frames to be hidden from backtraces and automatically skipped over when navigating the stack with `up` and `down`. This does not affect the numbering of frames, so `f <N>` will still provide access to the hidden frames. The `bt` output will also print a hint that frames have been hidden. My primary motivation for this feature is to hide thunks in the Swift programming language, but I'm including an example recognizer for `std::function::operator()` that I wished for myself many times while debugging LLDB. rdar://126629381 Example output. (Yes, my proof-of-concept recognizer could hide even more frames if we had a method that returned the function name without the return type or I used something that isn't based off regex, but it's really only meant as an example). before: ``` (lldb) thread backtrace --filtered=false * thread swiftlang#1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame swiftlang#1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame swiftlang#2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame swiftlang#3: 0x0000000100003968 a.out`std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff280, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:171:12 frame swiftlang#4: 0x00000001000026bc a.out`std::__1::__function::__func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()(this=0x000000016fdff278, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:313:10 frame swiftlang#5: 0x0000000100003c38 a.out`std::__1::__function::__value_func<int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff278, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) const at function.h:430:12 frame swiftlang#6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame swiftlang#7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame swiftlang#8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 (lldb) ``` after ``` (lldb) bt * thread swiftlang#1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame swiftlang#1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame swiftlang#2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame swiftlang#6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame swiftlang#7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame swiftlang#8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 Note: Some frames were hidden by frame recognizers ``` (cherry picked from commit f01f80c)

) Currently, process of replacing bitwise operations consisting of `LSR`/`LSL` with `And` is performed by `DAGCombiner`. However, in certain cases, the `AND` generated by this process can be removed. Consider following case: ``` lsr x8, x8, #56 and x8, x8, #0xfc ldr w0, [x2, x8] ret ``` In this case, we can remove the `AND` by changing the target of `LDR` to `[X2, X8, LSL #2]` and right-shifting amount change to 56 to 58. after changed: ``` lsr x8, x8, #58 ldr w0, [x2, x8, lsl #2] ret ``` This patch checks to see if the `SHIFTING` + `AND` operation on load target can be optimized and optimizes it if it can.

`JITDylibSearchOrderResolver` local variable can be destroyed before completion of all callbacks. Capture it together with `Deps` in `OnEmitted` callback. Original error: ``` ==2035==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-return on address 0x7bebfa155b70 at pc 0x7ff2a9a88b4a bp 0x7bec08d51980 sp 0x7bec08d51978 READ of size 8 at 0x7bebfa155b70 thread T87 (tf_xla-cpu-llvm) #0 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in operator() llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp:55:58 #1 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in __invoke<(lambda at llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp:55:9) &, const llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void> >, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void> > > > &> libcxx/include/__type_traits/invoke.h:149:25 #2 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in __call<(lambda at llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp:55:9) &, const llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void> >, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void> > > > &> libcxx/include/__type_traits/invoke.h:224:5 #3 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in operator() libcxx/include/__functional/function.h:210:12 #4 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in void std::__u::__function::__policy_invoker<void (llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, ```

Static destructor can race with calls to notify and trigger tsan warning. ``` WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=5787) Write of size 1 at 0x55bec9df8de8 by thread T23: #0 pthread_mutex_destroy [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:1344](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp?l=1344&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x1b12affb) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) #1 __libcpp_recursive_mutex_destroy [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__thread/support/pthread.h:91](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__thread/support/pthread.h?l=91&cl=669089572):10 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x4523d4e9) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) #2 std::__tsan::recursive_mutex::~recursive_mutex() [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/src/mutex.cpp:52](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/src/mutex.cpp?l=52&cl=669089572):11 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x4523d4e9) #3 ~SmartMutex [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Mutex.h:28](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Mutex.h?l=28&cl=669089572):11 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaedfe) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) #4 (anonymous namespace)::PerfJITEventListener::~PerfJITEventListener() [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp:65](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp?l=65&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaedfe) #5 cxa_at_exit_callback_installed_at(void*) [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:437](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp?l=437&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x1b172cb9) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) #6 llvm::JITEventListener::createPerfJITEventListener() [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp:496](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp?l=496&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcad8f5) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) ``` ``` Previous atomic read of size 1 at 0x55bec9df8de8 by thread T192 (mutexes: write M0, write M1): #0 pthread_mutex_unlock [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:1387](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp?l=1387&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x1b12b6bb) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) #1 __libcpp_recursive_mutex_unlock [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__thread/support/pthread.h:87](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__thread/support/pthread.h?l=87&cl=669089572):10 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x4523d589) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) #2 std::__tsan::recursive_mutex::unlock() [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/src/mutex.cpp:64](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/src/mutex.cpp?l=64&cl=669089572):11 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x4523d589) #3 unlock [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Mutex.h:47](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Mutex.h?l=47&cl=669089572):16 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaf968) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) #4 ~lock_guard [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__mutex/lock_guard.h:39](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__mutex/lock_guard.h?l=39&cl=669089572):101 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaf968) #5 (anonymous namespace)::PerfJITEventListener::notifyObjectLoaded(unsigned long, llvm::object::ObjectFile const&, llvm::RuntimeDyld::LoadedObjectInfo const&) [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp:290](https://cs.corp.google.com/piper///depot/google3/third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp?l=290&cl=669089572):1 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaf968) #6 llvm::orc::RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer::onObjEmit(llvm::orc::MaterializationResponsibility&, llvm::object::OwningBinary<llvm::object::ObjectFile>, std::__tsan::unique_ptr<llvm::RuntimeDyld::MemoryManager, std::__tsan::default_delete<llvm::RuntimeDyld::MemoryManager>>, std::__tsan::unique_ptr<llvm::RuntimeDyld::LoadedObjectInfo, std::__tsan::default_delete<llvm::RuntimeDyld::LoadedObjectInfo>>, std::__tsan::unique_ptr<llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void>>, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void>>>>, std::__tsan::default_delete<llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void>>, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void>>>>>>, llvm::Error) [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp:386](https://cs.corp.google.com/piper///depot/google3/third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp?l=386&cl=669089572):10 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bc404a8) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) ```

…llvm#94981) This extends default argument deduction to cover class templates as well, applying only to partial ordering, adding to the provisional wording introduced in llvm#89807. This solves some ambuguity introduced in P0522 regarding how template template parameters are partially ordered, and should reduce the negative impact of enabling `-frelaxed-template-template-args` by default. Given the following example: ```C++ template <class T1, class T2 = float> struct A; template <class T3> struct B; template <template <class T4> class TT1, class T5> struct B<TT1<T5>>; // #1 template <class T6, class T7> struct B<A<T6, T7>>; // #2 template struct B<A<int>>; ``` Prior to P0522, `#2` was picked. Afterwards, this became ambiguous. This patch restores the pre-P0522 behavior, `#2` is picked again.

…ang#2) Further improve how lldb constructing clang importer to utilize explicit modules: * Make sure the direct cc1 arguments are not repeated constructed. It should only be constructed as a fresh invocation * Make sure the lldb doesn't overwrite the explicit module build settings when filter arguments. This ensures the already built explicit modules are used. * Use the newly added clang option that ignore CAS info when loading PCMs. This allows lldb to load CAS enabled PCM directly from disk. rdar://135611011

…ang#2) Further improve how lldb constructing clang importer to utilize explicit modules: * Add logics to initialize the swift ASTContext from direct cc1 arguments embedded in the swiftmodule * Make sure the direct cc1 arguments are not repeated constructed. It should only be constructed as a fresh invocation * Make sure the lldb doesn't overwrite the explicit module build settings when filter arguments. This ensures the already built explicit modules are used. * Use the newly added clang option that ignore CAS info when loading PCMs. This allows lldb to load CAS enabled PCM directly from disk. rdar://135611011

When SPARC Asan testing is enabled by PR llvm#107405, many Linux/sparc64 tests just hang like ``` #0 0xf7ae8e90 in syscall () from /usr/lib32/libc.so.6 #1 0x701065e8 in __sanitizer::FutexWait(__sanitizer::atomic_uint32_t*, unsigned int) () at compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux.cpp:766 #2 0x70107c90 in Wait () at compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.cpp:35 #3 0x700f7cac in Lock () at compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.h:196 #4 Lock () at compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_thread_registry.h:98 #5 LockThreads () at compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_thread.cpp:489 #6 0x700e9c8c in __asan::BeforeFork() () at compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_posix.cpp:157 #7 0xf7ac83f4 in ?? () from /usr/lib32/libc.so.6 Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?) ``` It turns out that this happens in tests using `internal_fork` (e.g. invoking `llvm-symbolizer`): unlike most other Linux targets, which use `clone`, Linux/sparc64 has to use `__fork` instead. While `clone` doesn't trigger `pthread_atfork` handlers, `__fork` obviously does, causing the hang. To avoid this, this patch disables `InstallAtForkHandler` and lets the ASan tests run to completion. Tested on `sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu`.

…ang#2) Further improve how lldb constructing clang importer to utilize explicit modules: * Add logics to initialize the swift ASTContext from direct cc1 arguments embedded in the swiftmodule * Make sure the direct cc1 arguments are not repeated constructed. It should only be constructed as a fresh invocation * Make sure the lldb doesn't overwrite the explicit module build settings when filter arguments. This ensures the already built explicit modules are used. * Use the newly added clang option that ignore CAS info when loading PCMs. This allows lldb to load CAS enabled PCM directly from disk. rdar://135611011

Jdevlieghere/fix a8b71ea - attempt #2

Further improve how lldb constructing clang importer to utilize explicit modules: * Add logics to initialize the swift ASTContext from direct cc1 arguments embedded in the swiftmodule * Make sure the direct cc1 arguments are not repeated constructed. It should only be constructed as a fresh invocation * Make sure the lldb doesn't overwrite the explicit module build settings when filter arguments. This ensures the already built explicit modules are used. * Use the newly added clang option that ignore CAS info when loading PCMs. This allows lldb to load CAS enabled PCM directly from disk. rdar://135611011

…ang#2) Further improve how lldb constructing clang importer to utilize explicit modules: * Add logics to initialize the swift ASTContext from direct cc1 arguments embedded in the swiftmodule * Make sure the direct cc1 arguments are not repeated constructed. It should only be constructed as a fresh invocation * Make sure the lldb doesn't overwrite the explicit module build settings when filter arguments. This ensures the already built explicit modules are used. * Use the newly added clang option that ignore CAS info when loading PCMs. This allows lldb to load CAS enabled PCM directly from disk. rdar://135611011 (cherry picked from commit d3b9f2c)

…104523) Compilers and language runtimes often use helper functions that are fundamentally uninteresting when debugging anything but the compiler/runtime itself. This patch introduces a user-extensible mechanism that allows for these frames to be hidden from backtraces and automatically skipped over when navigating the stack with `up` and `down`. This does not affect the numbering of frames, so `f <N>` will still provide access to the hidden frames. The `bt` output will also print a hint that frames have been hidden. My primary motivation for this feature is to hide thunks in the Swift programming language, but I'm including an example recognizer for `std::function::operator()` that I wished for myself many times while debugging LLDB. rdar://126629381 Example output. (Yes, my proof-of-concept recognizer could hide even more frames if we had a method that returned the function name without the return type or I used something that isn't based off regex, but it's really only meant as an example). before: ``` (lldb) thread backtrace --filtered=false * thread swiftlang#1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame swiftlang#1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame swiftlang#2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame swiftlang#3: 0x0000000100003968 a.out`std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff280, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:171:12 frame swiftlang#4: 0x00000001000026bc a.out`std::__1::__function::__func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()(this=0x000000016fdff278, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:313:10 frame swiftlang#5: 0x0000000100003c38 a.out`std::__1::__function::__value_func<int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff278, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) const at function.h:430:12 frame swiftlang#6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame swiftlang#7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame swiftlang#8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 (lldb) ``` after ``` (lldb) bt * thread swiftlang#1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame swiftlang#1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame swiftlang#2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame swiftlang#6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame swiftlang#7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame swiftlang#8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 Note: Some frames were hidden by frame recognizers ``` (cherry picked from commit f01f80c)

…ang#2) Further improve how lldb constructing clang importer to utilize explicit modules: * Add logics to initialize the swift ASTContext from direct cc1 arguments embedded in the swiftmodule * Make sure the direct cc1 arguments are not repeated constructed. It should only be constructed as a fresh invocation * Make sure the lldb doesn't overwrite the explicit module build settings when filter arguments. This ensures the already built explicit modules are used. * Use the newly added clang option that ignore CAS info when loading PCMs. This allows lldb to load CAS enabled PCM directly from disk. rdar://135611011 (cherry picked from commit d3b9f2c)

Further improve how lldb constructing clang importer to utilize explicit modules: * Add logics to initialize the swift ASTContext from direct cc1 arguments embedded in the swiftmodule * Make sure the direct cc1 arguments are not repeated constructed. It should only be constructed as a fresh invocation * Make sure the lldb doesn't overwrite the explicit module build settings when filter arguments. This ensures the already built explicit modules are used. * Use the newly added clang option that ignore CAS info when loading PCMs. This allows lldb to load CAS enabled PCM directly from disk. rdar://135611011 (cherry picked from commit d3b9f2c)

…ap (llvm#108825) This attempts to improve user-experience when LLDB stops on a verbose_trap. Currently if a `__builtin_verbose_trap` triggers, we display the first frame above the call to the verbose_trap. So in the newly added test case, we would've previously stopped here: ``` (lldb) run Process 28095 launched: '/Users/michaelbuch/a.out' (arm64) Process 28095 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Bounds error: out-of-bounds access frame #1: 0x0000000100003f5c a.out`std::__1::vector<int>::operator[](this=0x000000016fdfebef size=0, (null)=10) at verbose_trap.cpp:6:9 3 template <typename T> 4 struct vector { 5 void operator[](unsigned) { -> 6 __builtin_verbose_trap("Bounds error", "out-of-bounds access"); 7 } 8 }; ``` After this patch, we would stop in the first non-`std` frame: ``` (lldb) run Process 27843 launched: '/Users/michaelbuch/a.out' (arm64) Process 27843 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Bounds error: out-of-bounds access frame #2: 0x0000000100003f44 a.out`g() at verbose_trap.cpp:14:5 11 12 void g() { 13 std::vector<int> v; -> 14 v[10]; 15 } 16 ``` rdar://134490328

…ap (llvm#108825) This attempts to improve user-experience when LLDB stops on a verbose_trap. Currently if a `__builtin_verbose_trap` triggers, we display the first frame above the call to the verbose_trap. So in the newly added test case, we would've previously stopped here: ``` (lldb) run Process 28095 launched: '/Users/michaelbuch/a.out' (arm64) Process 28095 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Bounds error: out-of-bounds access frame #1: 0x0000000100003f5c a.out`std::__1::vector<int>::operator[](this=0x000000016fdfebef size=0, (null)=10) at verbose_trap.cpp:6:9 3 template <typename T> 4 struct vector { 5 void operator[](unsigned) { -> 6 __builtin_verbose_trap("Bounds error", "out-of-bounds access"); 7 } 8 }; ``` After this patch, we would stop in the first non-`std` frame: ``` (lldb) run Process 27843 launched: '/Users/michaelbuch/a.out' (arm64) Process 27843 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Bounds error: out-of-bounds access frame #2: 0x0000000100003f44 a.out`g() at verbose_trap.cpp:14:5 11 12 void g() { 13 std::vector<int> v; -> 14 v[10]; 15 } 16 ``` rdar://134490328 (cherry picked from commit bca5073)

[cherry-pick][stable/20240723] [lldb][FrameRecognizer] Display the first non-std frame on verbose_trap This attempts to improve user-experience when LLDB stops on a verbose_trap. Currently if a `__builtin_verbose_trap` triggers, we display the first frame above the call to the verbose_trap. So in the newly added test case, we would've previously stopped here: ``` (lldb) run Process 28095 launched: '/Users/michaelbuch/a.out' (arm64) Process 28095 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Bounds error: out-of-bounds access frame #1: 0x0000000100003f5c a.out`std::__1::vector<int>::operator[](this=0x000000016fdfebef size=0, (null)=10) at verbose_trap.cpp:6:9 3 template <typename T> 4 struct vector { 5 void operator[](unsigned) { -> 6 __builtin_verbose_trap("Bounds error", "out-of-bounds access"); 7 } 8 }; ``` After this patch, we would stop in the first non-`std` frame: ``` (lldb) run Process 27843 launched: '/Users/michaelbuch/a.out' (arm64) Process 27843 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Bounds error: out-of-bounds access frame #2: 0x0000000100003f44 a.out`g() at verbose_trap.cpp:14:5 11 12 void g() { 13 std::vector<int> v; -> 14 v[10]; 15 } 16 ``` rdar://134490328 (cherry picked from commit bca5073)

…104523) Compilers and language runtimes often use helper functions that are fundamentally uninteresting when debugging anything but the compiler/runtime itself. This patch introduces a user-extensible mechanism that allows for these frames to be hidden from backtraces and automatically skipped over when navigating the stack with `up` and `down`. This does not affect the numbering of frames, so `f <N>` will still provide access to the hidden frames. The `bt` output will also print a hint that frames have been hidden. My primary motivation for this feature is to hide thunks in the Swift programming language, but I'm including an example recognizer for `std::function::operator()` that I wished for myself many times while debugging LLDB. rdar://126629381 Example output. (Yes, my proof-of-concept recognizer could hide even more frames if we had a method that returned the function name without the return type or I used something that isn't based off regex, but it's really only meant as an example). before: ``` (lldb) thread backtrace --filtered=false * thread swiftlang#1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame swiftlang#1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame swiftlang#2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame swiftlang#3: 0x0000000100003968 a.out`std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff280, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:171:12 frame swiftlang#4: 0x00000001000026bc a.out`std::__1::__function::__func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()(this=0x000000016fdff278, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:313:10 frame swiftlang#5: 0x0000000100003c38 a.out`std::__1::__function::__value_func<int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff278, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) const at function.h:430:12 frame swiftlang#6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame swiftlang#7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame swiftlang#8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 (lldb) ``` after ``` (lldb) bt * thread swiftlang#1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame swiftlang#1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame swiftlang#2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame swiftlang#6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame swiftlang#7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame swiftlang#8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 Note: Some frames were hidden by frame recognizers ``` (cherry picked from commit f01f80c)

…104523) Compilers and language runtimes often use helper functions that are fundamentally uninteresting when debugging anything but the compiler/runtime itself. This patch introduces a user-extensible mechanism that allows for these frames to be hidden from backtraces and automatically skipped over when navigating the stack with `up` and `down`. This does not affect the numbering of frames, so `f <N>` will still provide access to the hidden frames. The `bt` output will also print a hint that frames have been hidden. My primary motivation for this feature is to hide thunks in the Swift programming language, but I'm including an example recognizer for `std::function::operator()` that I wished for myself many times while debugging LLDB. rdar://126629381 Example output. (Yes, my proof-of-concept recognizer could hide even more frames if we had a method that returned the function name without the return type or I used something that isn't based off regex, but it's really only meant as an example). before: ``` (lldb) thread backtrace --filtered=false * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame #3: 0x0000000100003968 a.out`std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff280, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:171:12 frame #4: 0x00000001000026bc a.out`std::__1::__function::__func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()(this=0x000000016fdff278, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:313:10 frame #5: 0x0000000100003c38 a.out`std::__1::__function::__value_func<int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff278, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) const at function.h:430:12 frame #6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame #7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame #8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 (lldb) ``` after ``` (lldb) bt * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame #6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame #7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame #8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 Note: Some frames were hidden by frame recognizers ``` (cherry picked from commit f01f80c)

[lldb][NFC] Actually test which method we call in TestCallOverriddenM…

4be8e6b

…ethod llvm-svn: 373051

swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2019

[PowerPC][NFC] Remove deprecated Function Attrs comments #2

31d3c1d

JDevlieghere merged commit f23faf8 into swiftlang:swift/master Oct 25, 2019

marcrasi mentioned this pull request Feb 13, 2020

[lldb] Rewrite Swift completion logic in REPL to not crash [WIP] #662

Closed

kendalharland mentioned this pull request Aug 8, 2024

LLDB test TestCppBitFields.py fails on Windows x86_64 with fatal access violation #9072

Open

JDevlieghere added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2024

Merge pull request #9265 from swiftlang/jdevlieghere/fix-a8b71ea-2

308166d

Jdevlieghere/fix a8b71ea - attempt #2

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[lldb][NFC] Actually test which method we call in TestCallOverriddenMethod #2

[lldb][NFC] Actually test which method we call in TestCallOverriddenMethod #2

Teemperor commented Oct 18, 2019

Teemperor commented Oct 18, 2019

hyp commented Oct 19, 2019

[lldb][NFC] Actually test which method we call in TestCallOverriddenMethod #2

[lldb][NFC] Actually test which method we call in TestCallOverriddenMethod #2

Conversation

Teemperor commented Oct 18, 2019

Teemperor commented Oct 18, 2019

hyp commented Oct 19, 2019