Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 25, 2022. It is now read-only.

Commit

Permalink
Fixes #96
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
Lars T Hansen committed May 4, 2016
1 parent 19df2c0 commit c0800ce
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 14 additions and 2 deletions.
8 changes: 7 additions & 1 deletion tc39/shmem.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ <h1><span class="secnum"></span>Introduction<span class="utils"><span class="anc

<p>Changelog:</p>
<ul>
<li> 2016-05-04 -- (Issue 94) Clarified slightly the meaning of lock-free.
<li> 2016-05-04 -- (Issue 94, Issue 96) Clarified slightly the meaning of lock-free.

</li><li> 2016-04-06 -- Moved Agent Clusters and shared memory specific agent properties back into this spec; the agents spec is being split into <a href="https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/522">a PR</a> and ideas specific to the shared memory proposal.

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -276,6 +276,12 @@ <h1><span class="secnum">3.2</span>Agents (AMENDMENTS)<span class="utils"><span
upper bound on how many machine steps may be required to
complete a lock-free atomic operation. </p>

<p>That an atomic access of size <em>n</em> is lock-free does
not imply anything about the (perceived) atomicity of
non-atomic accesses of size <em>n</em>, specifically,
non-atomic accesses may still be performed as a sequence of
several separate memory accesses. </p>

</emu-note>

</emu-clause>
Expand Down
8 changes: 7 additions & 1 deletion tc39/spec.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ <h1>Introduction</h1>

<p>Changelog:</p>
<ul>
<li> 2016-05-04 -- (Issue 94) Clarified slightly the meaning of lock-free.
<li> 2016-05-04 -- (Issue 94, Issue 96) Clarified slightly the meaning of lock-free.
<li> 2016-04-06 -- Moved Agent Clusters and shared memory specific agent properties back into this spec; the agents spec is being split into <a href="https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/522">a PR</a> and ideas specific to the shared memory proposal.
<li> 2016-03-30 -- (Issue 95) Renamed Atomics.futexWait as Atomics.wait and Atomics.futexWake as Atomics.wake. No functional change.
<li> 2016-03-30 -- (Issue 90) Factor AtomicFetchOp out as a semantic algorithm, and reference it formally where appropriate. No functional change.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -240,6 +240,12 @@ <h1>Agents (AMENDMENTS)</h1>
upper bound on how many machine steps may be required to
complete a lock-free atomic operation. </p>

<p>That an atomic access of size <em>n</em> is lock-free does
not imply anything about the (perceived) atomicity of
non-atomic accesses of size <em>n</em>, specifically,
non-atomic accesses may still be performed as a sequence of
several separate memory accesses. </p>

</emu-note>

</emu-clause>
Expand Down

0 comments on commit c0800ce

Please sign in to comment.