Customer Request #227215 [BE] PC registreation mobile no validation api changes

[GitVivekHub]

https://tracker.tekdi.net/issues/227215

I have ensured that following Pull Request Checklist is taken care of before sending this PR

• Code is formatted as per format decided
• Updated acceptance criteria in tracker
• Updated test cases in test-cases-tracker
• Updated new API endpoint if any in common postman collection
• Updated DB changes in db-tracker if any

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Enhanced mobile number validation for program coordinators, providing clearer feedback on existing users.
  • Improved username generation for program coordinators with a specific prefix.

• Bug Fixes

  • Updated logic to ensure accurate checks for user roles based on their relationships with facilitators and beneficiaries.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes in the ProgramCoordinatorService class improve the logic for validating the uniqueness of mobile numbers associated with program coordinators. The updated query checks for existing users with the same mobile number while considering the status of associated facilitators and beneficiaries. Additionally, the username generation logic has been modified to prepend "pc_" to the user's first name.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
src/src/program-coordinator/program-coordinator.service.ts	Enhanced mobile number uniqueness validation logic to include facilitator and beneficiary status checks; modified username generation logic.

Possibly related PRs

• Bug #226689 [BE] Verify-PSYC-validation-message-added #1501: The changes in the BeneficiariesService class involve enhancing response messages, which may relate to the improved clarity of user feedback in the main PR regarding mobile number validation.
• Customer Request #226691 [BE] Syc reason added to learner details api #1502: The addition of the syc_reason property in the BeneficiariesService class could be relevant as it expands the data model, potentially interacting with the user validation logic in the main PR.

Suggested labels

enhancement, Review effort [1-5]: 1

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 3

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

src/src/program-coordinator/program-coordinator.service.ts (1)

111-111: Correct grammatical error in error message

The error message should read "Mobile Number Already Exists as ${user_role}" for proper grammar.

Apply this diff to correct the message:

-    message: `Mobile Number Already Exist as ${user_role}`,
+    message: `Mobile Number Already Exists as ${user_role}`,

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 23b0480 and 80773c3.

Files selected for processing (1)

• src/src/program-coordinator/program-coordinator.service.ts (2 hunks)

Additional context used

Path-based instructions (1)

src/src/program-coordinator/program-coordinator.service.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.ts: "Review the JavaScript code for conformity with the Google JavaScript style guide, highlighting any deviations. Ensure that:

• The code adheres to best practices associated with nodejs.
• The code adheres to best practices associated with nestjs framework.
• The code adheres to best practices recommended for performance.
• The code adheres to similar naming conventions for controllers, models, services, methods, variables."