Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added additional patterns in .gitignore #2

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2018

Conversation

terrytangyuan
Copy link
Member

These patterns appear often after building and changes.

Copy link
Member

@yongtang yongtang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, Thanks!

@yongtang yongtang merged commit 2a54e0d into tensorflow:master Dec 9, 2018
@terrytangyuan terrytangyuan deleted the patch-1 branch December 9, 2018 03:32
yongtang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2022
* feat: reading from bigtable (#2)

Implements reading from bigtable in a synchronous manner.

* feat: RowRange and RowSet API.

* feat: parallel read (#4)

In this pr we make the read methods accept a row_set reading only rows specified by the user.
We also add a parallel read, that leverages the sample_row_keys method to split work among workers.

* feat: version filters (#6)

This PR adds support for Bigtable version filters.

* feat: support for other data types (#5)

* fix: linter fixes (#8)

* feat docs (#9)

* fix: building on windows (#12)

* fix: refactor bigtable package to api folder (#14)

moved bigtable to tfensorflow_io.python.api

* fix: tests hanging (#30)

changed path to bigtable emulator and cbt in tests

moved arguments' initializations to the body of the function in bigtable_ops.py

 fixed interleaveFromRange of column filters when using only one column

* fix: temporarily disable macos tests (#32)

* disable tests on macos

Co-authored-by: Kajetan Boroszko <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Kajetan Boroszko <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants