zerocopy dependency has a license incompatible with the crate itself
#176
Comments
|
@tkaitchuck I should be able to re-license; we've been considering doing this anyway. If I were to re-license and publish, would you be able to use the new release? |
|
Yes. To clarify, what sort of timeline are you looking at? |
I should be able to do it today; would that work for you? |
|
Yes, that's great |
joshlf
added a commit
to google/zerocopy
that referenced
this issue
Oct 24, 2023
Release under the existing license (BSD-style, 2-clause) and under MIT and Apache 2.0. Release 0.7.13. Unblocks tkaitchuck/aHash#176
joshlf
added a commit
to google/zerocopy
that referenced
this issue
Oct 24, 2023
Release under the existing license (BSD-style, 2-clause) and under MIT and Apache 2.0. Release 0.7.13. Unblocks tkaitchuck/aHash#176
|
Does this look like it'll work for you? google/zerocopy#542 |
joshlf
added a commit
to google/zerocopy
that referenced
this issue
Oct 24, 2023
Release under the existing license (BSD-style, 2-clause) and under MIT and Apache 2.0. Release 0.7.13. Unblocks tkaitchuck/aHash#176
joshlf
added a commit
to google/zerocopy
that referenced
this issue
Oct 24, 2023
Release under the existing license (BSD-style, 2-clause) and under MIT and Apache 2.0. Release 0.7.13. Unblocks tkaitchuck/aHash#176
joshlf
added a commit
to google/zerocopy
that referenced
this issue
Oct 24, 2023
Release under the existing license (BSD-style, 2-clause) and under MIT and Apache 2.0. Release 0.7.13. Unblocks tkaitchuck/aHash#176
joshlf
added a commit
to google/zerocopy
that referenced
this issue
Oct 24, 2023
Release under the existing license (BSD-style, 2-clause) and under MIT and Apache 2.0. Release 0.7.14. Unblocks tkaitchuck/aHash#176
|
Published 0.7.14 with these changes. Lmk if this fixes the problem. |
|
Thanks all! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
This was found by
cargo-denyin amethyst/specs#770.zerocopyhas the license stringBSD-2-Clause, butahashhasMIT OR Apache-2.0. The former is incompatible with the latter.Although this isn't in itself a fundamental problem, it does mean that the de-facto license that users of
ahashare operating under isBSD-2-Clause, which is less permissive and not suitable for some purposes.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: