-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 565
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Set up automated testing with SuperLUDist enabled #1091
Comments
As @bartlettroscoe points out, it would help to add SuperLUDist to the SEMS TPL mount. |
SuperLUDist could be added to the offical SEMS set of TPLs or someone could add a 'trilinos' project space and start adding its own TPL builds. See:
In fact, it is likely way past due for Trilinos. Trilinos is not the only (or the most important) SEMS customer so Trilinos is going to need to take on some of this itself. @jwillenbring, is something that one of the new Trilinos framework team members could take on? Note that this is important for testing of the Stratimkos/Amesos (@trilinos/amesos) and Stratimikos/Amesos2 (@trilinos/amesos2) adapters. |
Tracing this a bit, but a fair amount of the links in those linked issues & PRs are dead. Looking at what SuperLU modules I can load from SEMS currently, I'm seeing:
|
@ZUUL42 These are new as of 2017. @ibaned is it still useful to try to set up a build with superlu_dist 5.2.2, or should we work with SEMS to get a newer version installed? We could try the old version very quickly. We might be waiting until we have the new SEMS TPL system in place before we would try an upgraded version. |
It would be good to add SuperLUDist testing with the same version being used by ATDM (current SuperLUDist 5.4.0). That would avoid problems like #8258. |
I will communicate this to the SEMS TPL 2.0 TPL team. Thanks. |
Notes from first attempt to set this up in the intel 17 Pr build
Is there anyone from the Amesos2 project that can help with item 1? |
@srajama1 Do you know who might be able to comment on @prwolfe 's comment:
|
@prwolfe Any general updates on this? Is there a path forward for getting something in place, even if it is less than ideal? |
@jwillenbring : Do you just need a configure time error if both SuperLU and SuperLU_Dist are enabled ? Basically an if check in Cmake and throw an error or do you need something more complicated. @ndellingwood Keeping this on your radar. |
Jim,
I had run this before I left and found that there was a type mis-match between the installed libraries and what Trilinos expects. I was trying to trace down how Trilinios sets this up but did not get there yet.
Paul
From: James Willenbring ***@***.***>
Reply-To: trilinos/Trilinos ***@***.***>
Date: Thursday, March 25, 2021 at 1:35 PM
To: trilinos/Trilinos ***@***.***>
Cc: "Wolfenbarger, Paul R" ***@***.***>, Mention ***@***.***>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [trilinos/Trilinos] Set up automated testing with SuperLUDist enabled (#1091)
@prwolfe<https://github.com/prwolfe> Any general updates on this? Is there a path forward for getting something in place, even if it is less than ideal?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1091 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB2OSCMCX35GVFVKBYIXAS3TFOGA5ANCNFSM4DBNNTDA>.
|
I found a pair of issues today
I am running testing now and should have a PR in the morning. |
Last nights build failed on the issue in #5472. I have re-started the build. It will likely be Friday before I get back to the results. |
With #8947 merged, I am closing this. |
As pointed out in #410, #1083, and #1090, it would be valuable to have automated Trilinos testing that enables the SuperLUDist TPL.
@trilinos/framework
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: