Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add checkDependencies extension point for Lint. #146

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 13, 2018

Conversation

vanniktech
Copy link
Owner

@vanniktech vanniktech commented Aug 13, 2018

Fixes #141

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 13, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #146 into master will increase coverage by 0.31%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #146      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage      70.9%   71.22%   +0.31%     
- Complexity       97       99       +2     
============================================
  Files             5        5              
  Lines           275      278       +3     
  Branches         43       44       +1     
============================================
+ Hits            195      198       +3     
  Misses           68       68              
  Partials         12       12
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...h/code/quality/tools/CodeQualityToolsPlugin.groovy 75.96% <100%> (+0.2%) 85 <0> (+1) ⬆️
...com/vanniktech/code/quality/tools/LintExtension.kt 100% <100%> (ø) 13 <1> (+1) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 137a79b...818f696. Read the comment docs.

@vanniktech vanniktech merged commit e98ce6a into master Aug 13, 2018
@vanniktech vanniktech deleted the lint-checkdependencies branch August 13, 2018 15:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant