Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix crate namespace leftover #2

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Fix crate namespace leftover #2

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion 0000-modules/motivation.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ believe the confusion has two causes, both addressed by this RFC.
In the crate root, absolute and relative paths are the same today. In other
languages this tends not to be the case. Instead, a common system is to place
the root of the current package under some namespace; this RFC proposes to do
just that, using the new `crate` namespace.
just that, using the new `local` namespace.

This will make absolute paths different from relative paths in every module,
including the crate root, so that users do not get mislead into believing that
Expand Down