Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Swagger changes for VaultGuardResource Object #13116

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Feb 25, 2021
Merged

Swagger changes for VaultGuardResource Object #13116

merged 14 commits into from
Feb 25, 2021

Conversation

deymadhumanti
Copy link
Contributor

@deymadhumanti deymadhumanti commented Feb 23, 2021

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Changelog

Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When you are targeting to deploy new service/feature to public regions? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet.
  3. When you expect to publish swagger? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet.
  4. If it's an update to existing version, please select SDKs of specific language and CLIs that require refresh after swagger is published.
    • SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • SDK of Python
    • SDK of Java
    • SDK of Js
    • SDK of Go
    • PowerShell
    • CLI
    • Terraform
    • No, no need to refresh for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.

    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
    • Adding a new service
  • Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in stable version
  • Removing properties in stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in stable version
  • Updating API in stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

This PR has changes from https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs-pr/pull/1488. which was already approved. Has done name changes (like ResourceOperationGateKeeper to VaultGuard)

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @deymadhumanti Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    Swagger pipeline can not start as the pull request has merge conflicts.

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    Swagger pipeline can not start as the pull request has merge conflicts.

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 23, 2021

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 19 Warnings warning [Detail] Only 10 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    ⚠️ R1003 - ListInOperationName Since operation 'VaultGuards_GetResourcesInSubscription' response has model definition 'x-ms-pageable', it should be of the form '_list'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/preview/2021-02-01-preview/dataprotection.json#L1768
    ⚠️ R1003 - ListInOperationName Since operation 'VaultGuards_GetResourcesInResourceGroup' response has model definition 'x-ms-pageable', it should be of the form '_list'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/preview/2021-02-01-preview/dataprotection.json#L1810
    ⚠️ R1003 - ListInOperationName Since operation 'VaultGuards_GetOperationRequestObjects' response has model definition 'x-ms-pageable', it should be of the form '_list'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/preview/2021-02-01-preview/dataprotection.json#L2066
    ⚠️ R1006 - PutInOperationName 'PUT' operation 'VaultGuards_Put' should use method name 'Create'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/preview/2021-02-01-preview/dataprotection.json#L1855
    ⚠️ R1007 - PatchInOperationName 'PATCH' operation 'VaultGuards_Patch' should use method name 'Update'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/preview/2021-02-01-preview/dataprotection.json#L2008
    ⚠️ R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/preview/2021-02-01-preview/dataprotection.json#L4646
    ⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: allowAutoApprovals
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/preview/2021-02-01-preview/dataprotection.json#L4598
    ⚠️ R3018 - EnumInsteadOfBoolean Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isProtectedByVaultGuard
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/preview/2021-02-01-preview/dataprotection.json#L4632
    ⚠️ R4000 - ParameterDescriptionRequired 'vaultGuardsName' parameter lacks 'description' property. Consider adding a 'description' element. Accurate description is essential for maintaining reference documentation.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/preview/2021-02-01-preview/dataprotection.json#L2080
    ⚠️ R4000 - ParameterDescriptionRequired 'operationName' parameter lacks 'description' property. Consider adding a 'description' element. Accurate description is essential for maintaining reference documentation.
    Location: Microsoft.DataProtection/preview/2021-02-01-preview/dataprotection.json#L2087
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on preview version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on stable version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️⚠️[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation: 11 Warnings warning [Detail] Only 10 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"dataprotection/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-02-preview",
    "details":"The schema 'AzureBackupRecoveryPointResource' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"dataprotection/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-02-preview",
    "details":"The schema 'BackupInstanceResource' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"dataprotection/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-02-preview",
    "details":"The schema 'BackupVaultResource' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"dataprotection/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-02-preview",
    "details":"The schema 'BaseBackupPolicyResource' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"dataprotection/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-02-preview",
    "details":"The schema 'CloudError' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"dataprotection/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-02-preview",
    "details":"The schema 'Error' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"dataprotection/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-02-preview",
    "details":"The schema 'ErrorAdditionalInfo' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"dataprotection/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-02-preview",
    "details":"The schema 'JobExtendedInfo-additionalDetails' with an undefined type and additionalProperties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"dataprotection/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-02-preview",
    "details":"The schema 'JobSubTask-additionalDetails' with an undefined type and additionalProperties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ⚠️ PreCheck/SchemaMissingType "readme":"dataprotection/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-02-preview",
    "details":"The schema 'VaultGuardResource' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'"
    ️️✔️[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Feb 23, 2021

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️🔄[Staging] ApiDocPreview inProgress [Detail]
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from c3722074be5f93f0e546a358ee37693851924b9a. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
      command	autorest --version=V2 --typescript --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.typescript@4.4.4 --typescript-sdks-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-js/azure-sdk-for-js ../../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/dataprotection/resource-manager/readme.md
    • ️✔️@azure/arm-dataprotectionplatform [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
      cmderr	[npmPack] loaded rollup.config.js with warnings
      cmderr	[npmPack] (!) Unused external imports
      cmderr	[npmPack] default imported from external module 'rollup' but never used
      cmderr	[npmPack] ./esm/dataProtectionClient.js → ./dist/arm-dataprotectionplatform.js...
      cmderr	[npmPack] created ./dist/arm-dataprotectionplatform.js in 518ms
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs] Generate from c3722074be5f93f0e546a358ee37693851924b9a. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️azure-mgmt-dataprotection [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog]   - Initial Release
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from c3722074be5f93f0e546a358ee37693851924b9a. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./initScript.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	go run ./tools/generator/main.go ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️preview/dataprotection/mgmt/2021-02-01-preview/dataprotection [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] This is a new package
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs] Generate from c3722074be5f93f0e546a358ee37693851924b9a. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-24 10:40:39 INFO [VERSION][Not Found] cannot find version for "com.azure.resourcemanager:azure-resourcemanager-dataprotection"
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-24 10:40:39 INFO [VERSION][Not Found] cannot find stable version, current version "1.0.0-beta.1"
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-24 10:40:39 INFO autorest --version=3.0.6369 --use=@autorest/java@4.0.17 --java.azure-libraries-for-java-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-java --java.output-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-java/sdk/dataprotection/azure-resourcemanager-dataprotection --java.namespace=com.azure.resourcemanager.dataprotection   --java --pipeline.modelerfour.additional-checks=false --pipeline.modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication=true --azure-arm --verbose --sdk-integration --fluent=lite --java.fluent=lite --java.license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_SMALL ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/dataprotection/resource-manager/readme.md
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-24 10:41:19 INFO [CI][Success] Write to ci.yml
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-24 10:41:19 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with pom.xml
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-24 10:41:19 INFO [POM][Skip] pom already has module azure-resourcemanager-dataprotection
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-24 10:41:19 INFO [POM][Success] Write to pom.xml
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-24 10:41:19 INFO [POM][Process] dealing with root pom
      cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-02-24 10:41:19 INFO [POM][Success] Write to root pom
    • ️✔️azure-resourcemanager-dataprotection [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-02-24 10:44:05 DEBUG Got artifact_id: azure-resourcemanager-dataprotection
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-02-24 10:44:05 DEBUG Got artifact: pom.xml
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-02-24 10:44:05 DEBUG Got artifact: azure-resourcemanager-dataprotection-1.0.0-beta.1-javadoc.jar
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-02-24 10:44:05 DEBUG Got artifact: azure-resourcemanager-dataprotection-1.0.0-beta.1-sources.jar
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-02-24 10:44:05 DEBUG Got artifact: azure-resourcemanager-dataprotection-1.0.0-beta.1.jar
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-02-24 10:44:05 DEBUG Match jar package: azure-resourcemanager-dataprotection-1.0.0-beta.1.jar
      cmderr	[Inst] 2021-02-24 10:44:05 DEBUG output: {"full": "```sh\ncurl -L \"https://portal.azure-devex-tools.com/api/sdk-dl-pub?p=Azure/13116/azure-sdk-for-java/azure-resourcemanager-dataprotection/azure-resourcemanager-dataprotection-1.0.0-beta.1.jar\" -o azure-resourcemanager-dataprotection-1.0.0-beta.1.jar\nmvn install:install-file -DgroupId=com.azure.resourcemanager -DartifactId=azure-resourcemanager-dataprotection -Dversion=1.0.0-beta.0 -Dfile=azure-resourcemanager-dataprotection-1.0.0-beta.1.jar -Dpackaging=jar -DgeneratePom=true
      ```"}
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from c3722074be5f93f0e546a358ee37693851924b9a. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
      command	sudo apt-get install -y dotnet-sdk-5.0
      command	autorest --version=V2 --csharp --reflect-api-versions --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.csharp@2.3.82 --csharp-sdks-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/dataprotection/resource-manager/readme.md
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
    • ️✔️Microsoft.Azure.Management.DataProtection [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
      warn	Skip artifact folder because it doesn't exist: artifacts/packages
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @deymadhumanti, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff.

    TaskHow to fixPrioritySupport (Microsoft alias)
    AvocadoFix-AvocadoHighruowan
    Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHighraychen, jianyxi
    Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHighraychen,jianyxi
    LintDiffFix-LintDiffhighjianyxi, ruoxuan
    If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback."

    @deymadhumanti deymadhumanti changed the title Microsoft.data protection Swagger changes for VaultGuardResource Object Feb 24, 2021
    @chunyu3
    Copy link
    Member

    chunyu3 commented Feb 24, 2021

    /azp run automation - sdk

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

    @chunyu3 chunyu3 self-requested a review February 25, 2021 01:29
    @chunyu3 chunyu3 merged commit 7c6145f into Azure:Microsoft.DataProtection Feb 25, 2021
    @mayankagg9722 mayankagg9722 mentioned this pull request Feb 25, 2021
    25 tasks
    ChenTanyi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2021
    * New Readme Config File
    
    * New Go Language Readme Config File
    
    * New Azure AZ Readme Config File
    
    * New Azure CLI Readme Config File
    
    * New Typescript Language Readme Config File
    
    * New Python Language Readme Config File
    
    * New C# Language Readme Config File
    
    * New AzureResourceSchema Readme Config File
    
    * New Swagger Spec File
    
    * New Swagger Example Spec File
    
    * Microsoft.data protection (#12814)
    
    * moving changes from Private repo
    
    * changes for autorest vqalidation err
    
    * fix delete response
    
    * fixing lint and model errors
    
    * exposureControlledFeatures fixes
    
    * prettier fixes
    
    * fixing spell check issues
    
    * adding backuptype in custom-words
    
    * PolicyParameters related changes for Disk Backup
    
    * fixing PR comments
    
    * description changes
    
    * changes for preview to stable folder
    
    * changes for retention in monitoring
    
    * changes for stable in readme
    
    * fixing checklist gate issues
    
    * changes for systemdata in dppresource
    
    Co-authored-by: sumitmal <32121310+sumitmal@users.noreply.github.com>
    Co-authored-by: Mayank Aggarwal <mayaggar@microsoft.com>
    Co-authored-by: vityagi <vityagi@microsoft.com>
    
    * MFA MUA DPP swagger changes (#13081)
    
    * MFA MUA DPP swagger changes
    
    * Resolving PR comments
    
    Co-authored-by: Madhumanti Dey <madhude@microsoft.com>
    
    * Swagger changes for VaultGuardResource Object (#13116)
    
    * MFA MUA DPP swagger changes
    
    * Resolving PR comments
    
    * MFA MUA dpp swagger changes
    
    * Fixed preetierCheck failures
    
    * Fixed Avocado failures
    
    * Fixed LintDiff warning
    
    * resolved PR comments
    
    * GO SDK fix
    
    * Go SDK fix
    
    * Go SDK fix
    
    * preview related changes
    
    * Go SDK fix
    
    * resolved PR comments
    
    Co-authored-by: Madhumanti Dey <madhude@microsoft.com>
    
    * changes for preview DPP version
    
    * fix for credscan SAS
    
    Co-authored-by: sumitmal2711 <58544969+sumitmal2711@users.noreply.github.com>
    Co-authored-by: sumitmal <32121310+sumitmal@users.noreply.github.com>
    Co-authored-by: Mayank Aggarwal <mayaggar@microsoft.com>
    Co-authored-by: vityagi <vityagi@microsoft.com>
    Co-authored-by: deymadhumanti <58032062+deymadhumanti@users.noreply.github.com>
    Co-authored-by: Madhumanti Dey <madhude@microsoft.com>
    mkarmark pushed a commit to mkarmark/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2021
    * New Readme Config File
    
    * New Go Language Readme Config File
    
    * New Azure AZ Readme Config File
    
    * New Azure CLI Readme Config File
    
    * New Typescript Language Readme Config File
    
    * New Python Language Readme Config File
    
    * New C# Language Readme Config File
    
    * New AzureResourceSchema Readme Config File
    
    * New Swagger Spec File
    
    * New Swagger Example Spec File
    
    * Microsoft.data protection (Azure#12814)
    
    * moving changes from Private repo
    
    * changes for autorest vqalidation err
    
    * fix delete response
    
    * fixing lint and model errors
    
    * exposureControlledFeatures fixes
    
    * prettier fixes
    
    * fixing spell check issues
    
    * adding backuptype in custom-words
    
    * PolicyParameters related changes for Disk Backup
    
    * fixing PR comments
    
    * description changes
    
    * changes for preview to stable folder
    
    * changes for retention in monitoring
    
    * changes for stable in readme
    
    * fixing checklist gate issues
    
    * changes for systemdata in dppresource
    
    Co-authored-by: sumitmal <32121310+sumitmal@users.noreply.github.com>
    Co-authored-by: Mayank Aggarwal <mayaggar@microsoft.com>
    Co-authored-by: vityagi <vityagi@microsoft.com>
    
    * MFA MUA DPP swagger changes (Azure#13081)
    
    * MFA MUA DPP swagger changes
    
    * Resolving PR comments
    
    Co-authored-by: Madhumanti Dey <madhude@microsoft.com>
    
    * Swagger changes for VaultGuardResource Object (Azure#13116)
    
    * MFA MUA DPP swagger changes
    
    * Resolving PR comments
    
    * MFA MUA dpp swagger changes
    
    * Fixed preetierCheck failures
    
    * Fixed Avocado failures
    
    * Fixed LintDiff warning
    
    * resolved PR comments
    
    * GO SDK fix
    
    * Go SDK fix
    
    * Go SDK fix
    
    * preview related changes
    
    * Go SDK fix
    
    * resolved PR comments
    
    Co-authored-by: Madhumanti Dey <madhude@microsoft.com>
    
    * changes for preview DPP version
    
    * fix for credscan SAS
    
    Co-authored-by: sumitmal2711 <58544969+sumitmal2711@users.noreply.github.com>
    Co-authored-by: sumitmal <32121310+sumitmal@users.noreply.github.com>
    Co-authored-by: Mayank Aggarwal <mayaggar@microsoft.com>
    Co-authored-by: vityagi <vityagi@microsoft.com>
    Co-authored-by: deymadhumanti <58032062+deymadhumanti@users.noreply.github.com>
    Co-authored-by: Madhumanti Dey <madhude@microsoft.com>
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    3 participants