Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NTR: adding NLCD classes to biome #458

Closed
lstanish opened this issue Jan 11, 2017 · 14 comments
Closed

NTR: adding NLCD classes to biome #458

lstanish opened this issue Jan 11, 2017 · 14 comments
Assignees

Comments

@lstanish
Copy link

@pbuttigieg Would be great if ENVO mapped the U.S. National Land Cover Database terms: http://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd11_leg.php
There are 20 terms in the 2011 edition. Definitions are a bit long-winded, check out link for details.
NEON uses these terms to describe vegetation types, and U.S. federal agencies map land cover type with these terms.

@pbuttigieg
Copy link
Member

Thanks @lstanish ! We're on it. There may be some definitional cleanup and unpacking needed, but we'll make equivalencies for your use case.

@pbuttigieg
Copy link
Member

The link above seems to deliver a 404, perhaps due to the need for HTTPS. This link works.

For clarification, do you need semantics that align to specific environments (e.g. mixed forest) or areas of land/water dominated by specific environments (e.g. area with X% of mixed forest)? I think the latter makes more sense here.

@pbuttigieg
Copy link
Member

Hi @lstanish, in the commits above, I've added some classes that I think are capturing the semantics in the NLCD system. They'll look like this:
image

We'll export a subset for you to use. Let me know if this is okay!

pbuttigieg added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 23, 2017
@pbuttigieg
Copy link
Member

Currently creating classes to axiomatise "barren land"...

pbuttigieg added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 23, 2017
@lstanish
Copy link
Author

Hi @pbuttigieg, this is looking great.
WRT 'lichens' and 'moss', inclusion of the word "Alaska" in the term definition will exclude other lichenous and mossy regions of the world. This could limit ecological comparisons. Could ENVO possibly drop "Alaska" in term definition?
Thanks! -Lee

@pbuttigieg
Copy link
Member

pbuttigieg commented Jan 30, 2017

WRT 'lichens' and 'moss', inclusion of the word "Alaska" in the term definition will exclude other lichenous and mossy regions of the world. This could limit ecological comparisons. Could ENVO possibly drop "Alaska" in term definition?

Hi @lstanish - yes, we would have to in fact as EnvO classes should be location independent. A gazetteer would be used for named places.

@lstanish
Copy link
Author

@pbuttigieg Would love to see these updates, where can I go to look at the updates?

@pbuttigieg
Copy link
Member

pbuttigieg commented Feb 23, 2017

Hi @lstanish, you can look at the editors version of the file in src/envo/envo-edit.owl, but I'll release the first version soon. The time delay was due to me trying to weave in the classes to others in ENVO (creating new ones along the way). This proved quite tricky due to ambiguities I couldn't resolve from the papers and documentation available. I'll just add the remaining classes without too many cross-links (axioms). They're still usable for annotation and can be developed when the need arises (however, we'd need some expert guidance from NLCD to do this well).

@pbuttigieg
Copy link
Member

Hi @lstanish, the first released version of the NLCD 2011 classes is done! See our release notes here.

You can find the subset here.
This will soon have the stable PURL http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/envo/subsets/nlcd2011.owl, which should be used once it's registered.

Here's a table with the label and PURL. The NLCD label and IDs are included as Annotation properties in each class in the OWL file.

Label PURL
area of barren land http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000752
area of cropland http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000892
area of deciduous forest http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000816
area of developed open space http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000883
area of developed space with high usage intensity http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000886
area of developed space with low usage intensity http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000884
area of developed space with medium usage intensity http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000885
area of dwarf scrub http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000861
area of emergent herbaceous wetland http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000894
area of evergreen forest http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000843
area of gramanoid or herbaceous vegetation http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000888
area of lichen-dominated vegetation http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000889
area of mixed forest http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000855
area of moss-dominated vegetation http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000890
area of open water http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000666
area of pastureland or hayfields http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000891
area of perennial ice or snow http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000746
area of perennial snow http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000745
area of perennial water ice http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000740
area of scrub http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000869
area of sedge- and forb-dominated herbaceious vegetation http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000887
area of woody wetland http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01000893

@pbuttigieg
Copy link
Member

PS: the PURLs will take some hours to be registered on OntoBee, so don't be alarmed if they don't resolve right away. You can always open the subset's OWL file in Protege.

@pbuttigieg
Copy link
Member

Please reopen this issue if we need to create/modify content for your work!

@lstanish
Copy link
Author

lstanish commented Feb 27, 2017 via email

@chrlaney
Copy link

chrlaney commented Mar 2, 2017

This is great! Thanks @pbuttigieg @lstanish!

@pbuttigieg
Copy link
Member

Following up on #458 (comment), the PURLs should be live (via OntoBee) after this Saturday, see OntoZoo/ontobee#104

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants