Refactor ParticipantLocalTime to function component #20300

aldo-expensify · 2023-06-06T19:06:07Z

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #16262
PROPOSAL: GH_LINK_ISSUE(COMMENT)

Tests

Open a chat with a single other account that is in a different timezone
Send a message
Check that the time for the other account that is above the composer is updated every minute

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

Open a chat with a single other account that is in a different timezone
Send a message
Check that the time for the other account that is above the composer is updated every minute

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
- I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
- I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
- I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
- I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
- Android / native
- Android / Chrome
- iOS / native
- iOS / Safari
- MacOS / Chrome / Safari
- MacOS / Desktop
I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
- I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
  - If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web

Added a couple of console logs to make it more visible when the interval's callback is called and when we cancel it

Screen.Recording.2023-06-06.at.1.05.00.PM.mov

Mobile Web - Chrome

Mobile Web - Safari

Desktop

iOS

Android

melvin-bot · 2023-06-06T20:07:50Z

@fedirjh @roryabraham One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

fedirjh

Looks good. left minor comment about props destruction.

fedirjh · 2023-06-06T20:20:19Z

src/pages/home/report/ParticipantLocalTime.js

+}
+
+function ParticipantLocalTime(props) {
+    const {participant, preferredLocale, translate} = props;


I think we should avoid props destruction as per Style guidelines

This is to avoid a warning on the useEffect watched values:

I think that guideline shouldn't apply well to function components with useEffect

Seems we have a similar cases that got resolved with a partial destruction , you can check this thread https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1684969645381109

Are you suggesting I shouldn't destructure translate because that is not watched and we can keep accessing it as props.translate?

If that is the case, I don't have strong feeling toward that, but I think the best would be to have access to the translate function through a hook like it was suggested here: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1685068222924839?thread_ts=1684969645.381109&cid=C01GTK53T8Q

Are you suggesting I shouldn't destructure translate because that is not watched and we can keep accessing it as props.translate?

Sorry missed this comment. Well, props.translate should be watched as well, as the language may change during re-renders.

I suggested to proceed with the current destruction of props as you did.

fedirjh · 2023-06-06T21:25:26Z

src/pages/home/report/ParticipantLocalTime.js


-    render() {
-        const reportRecipientDisplayName = lodashGet(this.props, 'participant.firstName') || lodashGet(this.props, 'participant.displayName');
+    const reportRecipientDisplayName = lodashGet(props, 'participant.firstName') || lodashGet(props, 'participant.displayName');


@aldo-expensify Shouldn’t we wrap it with useMemo ? the state update will re-render the component every second.

Not worth it in my opinion.

useMemo doesn't prevent re-rendering.

Caching lodashGet(props, 'participant.firstName') || lodashGet(props, 'participant.displayName'); is probably more costly than recalculating it.

is probably more costly than recalculating it.

hmmm , make sense 👍🏼

the state update will re-render the component every second.

I just understood what you meant here. The interval is updating the state every second. I'll check if setting the state to the same value triggers a re-render or not. If it does, we should only set the state if it is really different.

Setting the state to the same value doesn't trigger a re-render:

Thank you , that’s perfect.

fedirjh · 2023-06-06T21:28:36Z

Reviewer Checklist

I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
- I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
- I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android / native
- Android / Chrome
- iOS / native
- iOS / Safari
- MacOS / Chrome / Safari
- MacOS / Desktop
If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
- I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web

Web.mov

Mobile Web - Chrome

Chrome.mov

Mobile Web - Safari

Safari.mov

Desktop

Desktop.mov

iOS

IOS.mov

Android

Android.mov

fedirjh

LGTM and tests well

roryabraham

LGTM 👍🏼

roryabraham

LGTM 👍🏼

OSBotify · 2023-06-06T23:15:30Z

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

OSBotify · 2023-06-08T17:03:51Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 1.3.26-0 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

OSBotify · 2023-06-13T00:24:33Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 1.3.26-4 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

aldo-expensify added 2 commits June 6, 2023 12:05

Refactor to function component

8f1a771

Use clearInterval

bf72be5

aldo-expensify self-assigned this Jun 6, 2023

aldo-expensify marked this pull request as ready for review June 6, 2023 20:07

aldo-expensify requested a review from a team as a code owner June 6, 2023 20:07

melvin-bot bot requested review from fedirjh and roryabraham and removed request for a team June 6, 2023 20:07

fedirjh reviewed Jun 6, 2023

View reviewed changes

fedirjh approved these changes Jun 6, 2023

View reviewed changes

roryabraham approved these changes Jun 6, 2023

View reviewed changes

roryabraham merged commit f4c6b9c into main Jun 6, 2023

roryabraham deleted the aldo_migrate-participant-local-time branch June 6, 2023 23:09

OSBotify mentioned this pull request Jun 8, 2023

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2023-06-08 #20466

Closed

74 tasks

melvin-bot bot mentioned this pull request Jun 12, 2023

[HOLD for payment 2023-06-19] [HOLD][$250] Migrate ParticipantLocalTime.js to function component #16262

Closed

1 task

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Refactor ParticipantLocalTime to function component #20300

Refactor ParticipantLocalTime to function component #20300

aldo-expensify commented Jun 6, 2023 •

edited

Loading

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 6, 2023

fedirjh left a comment

fedirjh Jun 6, 2023

aldo-expensify Jun 6, 2023 •

edited

Loading

fedirjh Jun 6, 2023

aldo-expensify Jun 6, 2023

fedirjh Jun 6, 2023

fedirjh Jun 6, 2023 •

edited

Loading

aldo-expensify Jun 6, 2023

fedirjh Jun 6, 2023

aldo-expensify Jun 6, 2023

aldo-expensify Jun 6, 2023

fedirjh Jun 6, 2023

fedirjh commented Jun 6, 2023

fedirjh left a comment

roryabraham left a comment

roryabraham left a comment

OSBotify commented Jun 6, 2023

OSBotify commented Jun 8, 2023

OSBotify commented Jun 13, 2023

Refactor ParticipantLocalTime to function component #20300

Refactor ParticipantLocalTime to function component #20300

Conversation

aldo-expensify commented Jun 6, 2023 • edited Loading

Details

Fixed Issues

Tests

Offline tests

QA Steps

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 6, 2023

fedirjh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

aldo-expensify Jun 6, 2023 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

fedirjh Jun 6, 2023 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

fedirjh commented Jun 6, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

fedirjh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

roryabraham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

roryabraham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

OSBotify commented Jun 6, 2023

OSBotify commented Jun 8, 2023

OSBotify commented Jun 13, 2023

aldo-expensify commented Jun 6, 2023 •

edited

Loading

aldo-expensify Jun 6, 2023 •

edited

Loading

fedirjh Jun 6, 2023 •

edited

Loading