Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: remove original region failover implementation #4237

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 5, 2024

Conversation

WenyXu
Copy link
Member

@WenyXu WenyXu commented Jul 1, 2024

I hereby agree to the terms of the GreptimeDB CLA.

Refer to a related PR or issue link (optional)

#4161

What's changed and what's your intention?

In #4172, we migrated original region failover implementation to region migration implementation. Now we can remove original region failure implementation.

Checklist

  • I have written the necessary rustdoc comments.
  • I have added the necessary unit tests and integration tests.
  • This PR requires documentation updates.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor

    • Removed public access to certain internal modules to streamline the codebase and enhance encapsulation.
    • Eliminated the region_failover module and associated comments to clean up the code.
    • Restructured test utilities for better maintainability.
  • Tests

    • Removed and commented out integration test modules related to region migration and failover.

@WenyXu WenyXu requested review from MichaelScofield and a team as code owners July 1, 2024 07:05
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 1, 2024

Walkthrough

The codebase has seen a cleanup effort focusing on module accessibility and relevant test utilities. Several modules were either removed or had their visibility restricted. Key changes include making specific modules private in lock.rs, removing the region_failover module in procedure.rs, and eliminating functionality in test_util.rs. Additionally, the region_migration module was removed from integration tests, and a region_failover module import was commented out.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/meta-srv/src/lock.rs Made the keys module private while keeping etcd and memory public.
src/meta-srv/src/procedure.rs Removed the region_failover module declaration and corresponding TODO comment.
src/meta-srv/src/test_util.rs Removed various imports and the function prepare_table_region_and_info_value, indicating code restructuring.
tests-integration/tests/main.rs Removed region_migration module and commented out region_failover import.

Poem

Here's a change to make things bright,
Modules trimmed, in summer's light.
Procedures clear, the old ones fade,
A cleaner path now finely laid.
Integration tests, a simpler way,
The bunnies cheer, hip-hip-hooray! 🐇✨


Tip

Early access features: enabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • OpenAI gpt-4o model for code reviews and chat: OpenAI claims that this model is better at understanding and generating code than the previous models. We seek your feedback over the next few weeks before making it generally available.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues.
  • OSS projects are currently opted into early access features by default.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the docs-not-required This change does not impact docs. label Jul 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/meta-srv/src/test_util.rs (3)

Line range hint 14-25: Improve readability of leader_peer assignment.

The current assignment of leader_peer can be simplified for better readability.

-  let leader_peer = peers.iter().find(|peer| peer.id == leader_node).cloned();
+  let leader_peer = peers.iter().cloned().find(|peer| peer.id == leader_node);

Line range hint 28-41: Improve error handling for unwrap call.

Using unwrap can cause the program to panic. Consider using expect with a meaningful error message or proper error handling.

-  .unwrap();
+  .expect("Failed to build MetaPeerClient");

Line range hint 44-59: Improve error handling for unwrap calls.

Using unwrap can cause the program to panic. Consider using expect with a meaningful error message or proper error handling.

-  let lease_key_bytes: Vec<u8> = lease_key.try_into().unwrap();
-  let lease_value_bytes: Vec<u8> = lease_value.try_into().unwrap();
+  let lease_key_bytes: Vec<u8> = lease_key.try_into().expect("Failed to convert lease key to bytes");
+  let lease_value_bytes: Vec<u8> = lease_value.try_into().expect("Failed to convert lease value to bytes");
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5d396bd and 13d3d55.

Files selected for processing (4)
  • src/meta-srv/src/lock.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/meta-srv/src/procedure.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/meta-srv/src/test_util.rs (2 hunks)
  • tests-integration/tests/main.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • src/meta-srv/src/lock.rs
  • src/meta-srv/src/procedure.rs
  • tests-integration/tests/main.rs

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.56%. Comparing base (6a634f8) to head (13d3d55).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4237      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.88%   84.56%   -0.33%     
==========================================
  Files        1046     1038       -8     
  Lines      184597   182957    -1640     
==========================================
- Hits       156694   154713    -1981     
- Misses      27903    28244     +341     

Copy link
Collaborator

@fengjiachun fengjiachun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@WenyXu WenyXu requested a review from evenyag July 2, 2024 06:44
@WenyXu WenyXu changed the title chore: remove original region failure implementation chore: remove original region failover implementation Jul 3, 2024
@evenyag evenyag added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 5, 2024
Merged via the queue into GreptimeTeam:main with commit 4f0984c Jul 5, 2024
56 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs-not-required This change does not impact docs.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants