Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Techstack-beta] Blog: URLs/categorization #1250

Closed
samueldr opened this issue Mar 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

[Techstack-beta] Blog: URLs/categorization #1250

samueldr opened this issue Mar 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
content new-techstack-beta This tag marks issues with the new tech stack during preview phase

Comments

@samueldr
Copy link
Member

samueldr commented Mar 2, 2024

Since this changes the presentation and contents of the section, I'll add notes about that.

URLs are meant to last. As such, deciding on their format is important.

Dated content should include the date in some form in the URL, it is useful UX-wise when faced with a bare URL, and also prevents duplicate generated URLs from being an issue.

The date should also be front-loaded in the URL, such that sorting them naturally orders them chronologically.

I was about to say that it also has the benefit of making the source easier to deal with, but I see it's already dated in the source. So in reality, the data already is there.

@thilobillerbeck thilobillerbeck added the new-techstack-beta This tag marks issues with the new tech stack during preview phase label Mar 2, 2024
@thilobillerbeck
Copy link
Collaborator

thilobillerbeck commented Mar 2, 2024

URLs are meant to last. As such, deciding on their format is important.

While I don't think anyone probably would really read the URLs (except for release announcements), I agree that it is maybe a good idea to add at least the year in front of every post

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content new-techstack-beta This tag marks issues with the new tech stack during preview phase
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants