-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HGCAL trigger] Technical developments on Stage 1 emulator, validation and floating point compression #42856
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-42856/36994
|
A new Pull Request was created by @jbsauvan (Jean-Baptiste Sauvan) for master. It involves the following packages:
@aloeliger, @epalencia, @nothingface0, @emanueleusai, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @pmandrik, @syuvivida, @tjavaid, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
Hello, would it be possible to trigger the tests? |
@cmsbuild please test |
-1 Failed Tests: ClangBuild Clang BuildI found compilation warning while trying to compile with clang. Command used:
See details on the summary page. |
if (isScintillator) { // HGCalHSc | ||
tc_vphi = (tc_vphi - 1) % 4; | ||
if (tc_ueta <= 3) { | ||
tc_ueta = tc_ueta; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You likely don't mean tc_ueta = tc_ueta
here. This is what is causing the build errors. What should this actually be?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @aloeliger
It is actually doing what it should be. Just the way it is written that is not ideal.
I will rewrite that.
… into a JSON file
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8ec00a/35057/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+l1 |
+Upgrade |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description
Technical developments:
Associated internal PRs and reviews:
PR validation
Tested D86, D92, D9 workflows