Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release/9.0] Backport some PACKAGE.md files #107724

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Sep 12, 2024

Conversation

buyaa-n
Copy link
Member

@buyaa-n buyaa-n commented Sep 11, 2024

Backport of #106443, #106781, #106782, #106783, #106784, #106785, #107372 to release/9.0

/cc @ericstj @jeffhandley

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

Customer impact from the The Add package readmes to shipping libraries packages issue:

One of the top customer problems that package consumers are facing is lack of documentation. As such, we are driving an effort to increase the adoption and quality of NuGet package READMEs.

The issue is planned for 9.0 and this PR is porting the PRs that is recently merged to main and not made to 9.0 branch

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

This is doc only change

Testing

NA, doc only change

Risk

Minimum, doc only change

eNeRGy164 and others added 7 commits September 11, 2024 16:33
* Provide System.Composition package readme

* Fix empty lines
)

* Provide System.Composition.AttributedModel package readme

* Improve after feedback

* Set correct PackageDescription
* Provide System.Composition.Convention package readme

* Improve after feedback
* Provide System.Composition.Hosting package readme

* Improve after feedback
* Provide System.Composition.Runtime package readme

* Improve after feedback
* Provide System.Composition.TypedParts package readme

* Improve after feedback
* Provide System.CodeDom package readme

* Add remark about Roslyn/.NET Compiler SDK

* Update src/libraries/System.CodeDom/src/PACKAGE.md

---------

Co-authored-by: Buyaa Namnan <buyankhishig.namnan@microsoft.com>
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Sep 11, 2024
@buyaa-n buyaa-n added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review area-Meta and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Sep 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-meta
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@carlossanlop
Copy link
Member

I think we can consider this tell-mode.

@carlossanlop carlossanlop added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 12, 2024
@jeffhandley
Copy link
Member

/ba-g The failures are unrelated to the packaging updates in this PR

@carlossanlop carlossanlop merged commit bef9c4a into dotnet:release/9.0 Sep 12, 2024
83 of 92 checks passed
@buyaa-n buyaa-n deleted the backport-mds branch September 12, 2024 21:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-Meta Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants