[wasm] updated samples for ES6 and CJS

[pavelsavara]

Modularized API and ES6

Reworked samples which demonstrate how to use modularized API and ES6

<PropertyGroup>
  <WasmEnableES6>true</WasmEnableES6>
</PropertyGroup>

To generate ES6 or CommonJS version of dotnet.js

• for V8 we need few more polyfills and also we need shim to import es6 script
• for NodeJs we need package.json with "type":"module" to import es6 script with '.js' extension
• for NodeJs + CommonJS works as is

In-tree relink of ES6 version implemented as MsBuild hack right now and would be fixed as part of #61294

ES6 Samples

Samples demonstrate the new API createDotnetRuntime()

Minimal browser sample

<script type='module' src="./main.mjs"></script>

import createDotnetRuntime from './dotnet.js'
const { MONO } = await createDotnetRuntime();
await MONO.mono_run_main_and_exit("Wasm.Console.V8.CJS.Sample.dll", []);

Still trivial sample

const { MONO, BINDING, Module, RuntimeBuildInfo } = await createDotnetRuntime(() => ({
    disableDotnet6Compatibility: true,
    configSrc: "./mono-config.json",
    onAbort: (err) => {
        console.log(`WASM ERROR ${err}`);
    },
}));

const testMeaning = BINDING.bind_static_method("[Wasm.Browser.Sample] Sample.Test:TestMeaning");
const ret = testMeaning();

CommonJS

NodeJS Sample

const createDotnetRuntime = require("./dotnet.js");

async function main() {
    const { MONO } = await createDotnetRuntime();
    const app_args = process.argv.slice(2);
    await MONO.mono_run_main_and_exit("Wasm.Console.CJS.Sample.dll", app_args);
};
main();

Contributes to #47336
Contributes to #41861
Fixes #61083

[ghost]

Tagging subscribers to 'arch-wasm': @lewing
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

---

work in progress

Author:	pavelsavara
Assignees:	-
Labels:	arch-wasm
Milestone:	7.0.0

[pavelsavara]

/azp run runtime-manual

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

[pavelsavara]

/azp run runtime-manual

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

[pavelsavara]

/azp run runtime-manual

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

[pavelsavara]

/azp run runtime-manual

[pavelsavara]

/azp run runtime-manual

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

[pavelsavara]

/azp run runtime-manual

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

[pavelsavara]

Failures are unrelated #62964

[maraf]

LGTM

[radekdoulik]

Why don't we want these conditions anymore?

[pavelsavara]

In my opinion, there is no other place which would run on NodeJS platform every time. Also this is runtime-manual pipeline. So it's already run with intention of getting more. I'm prepared to change it if it doesn't make sense.

[pavelsavara]

We agreed with Radek to put it back and make it consistent with other ones in the same file.
@steveisok eq(variables['isManualOrIsNotPR'], true), is this always true in this file ? Was is the idea behind it ? Or is that just copy&paste like in my case ?

[pavelsavara]

/azp run runtime-manual

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

[pavelsavara]

/azp run runtime-manual

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).