Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Improve perf of sync device lists" #17207

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2024

Conversation

erikjohnston
Copy link
Member

Reverts #17191

@erikjohnston erikjohnston requested a review from a team as a code owner May 16, 2024 15:07
@erikjohnston erikjohnston merged commit fd12003 into develop May 16, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
@erikjohnston erikjohnston deleted the revert-17191-erikj/faster_sync_devices branch May 16, 2024 15:07
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
Improve performance of calculating device lists changes in `/sync`.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why revert?

Are we going to port back this bug fix

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like this was causing some issues on matrix.org, possibly due to repeatedly sending down the same device list updates? We still need to investigate.

MadLittleMods added a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2024
This change was introduced in #17203

But then #17207 was
reverted which brought back usage `joined_rooms` that needed to be
updated. Wasn't caught because `develop` wasn't up to date before merging
MadLittleMods added a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2024
This change was introduced in
#17203

But then #17207 was reverted
which brought back usage `joined_rooms` that needed to be updated.
Wasn't caught because `develop` wasn't up to date before merging.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants