Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Rollup merge of rust-lang#41377 - nikomatsakis:issue-41298-ICE-infere…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…nce, r=eddyb

Fix ICE building gluon_vm

The problem was due to various places we were failing to propagate obligations. I think I got them mostly correct, but I didn't get around to writing test cases for each case.

r? @eddyb or @arielb1
  • Loading branch information
frewsxcv committed Apr 19, 2017
2 parents f778fd6 + 93e1097 commit 1d1013d
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 9 changed files with 60 additions and 26 deletions.
10 changes: 7 additions & 3 deletions src/librustc/infer/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1597,9 +1597,13 @@ impl<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
// generic so we don't have to do anything quite this
// terrible.
let trace = TypeTrace::dummy(self.tcx);
self.equate(true, trace, a, b).map(|InferOk { obligations, .. }| {
// FIXME(#32730) propagate obligations
assert!(obligations.is_empty());
self.equate(true, trace, a, b).map(|InferOk { obligations: _, .. }| {
// We can intentionally ignore obligations here, since
// this is part of a simple test for general
// "equatability". However, it's not entirely clear
// that we *ought* to be, perhaps a better thing would
// be to use a mini-fulfillment context or something
// like that.
})
})
}
Expand Down
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions src/librustc/traits/coherence.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -55,16 +55,15 @@ fn overlap<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx>(selcx: &mut SelectionContext<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx>,
debug!("overlap: b_impl_header={:?}", b_impl_header);

// Do `a` and `b` unify? If not, no overlap.
match selcx.infcx().eq_impl_headers(true,
let obligations = match selcx.infcx().eq_impl_headers(true,
&ObligationCause::dummy(),
&a_impl_header,
&b_impl_header) {
Ok(InferOk { obligations, .. }) => {
// FIXME(#32730) propagate obligations
assert!(obligations.is_empty());
obligations
}
Err(_) => return None
}
};

debug!("overlap: unification check succeeded");

Expand All @@ -78,6 +77,7 @@ fn overlap<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx>(selcx: &mut SelectionContext<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx>,
.map(|p| Obligation { cause: ObligationCause::dummy(),
recursion_depth: 0,
predicate: p })
.chain(obligations)
.find(|o| !selcx.evaluate_obligation(o));

if let Some(failing_obligation) = opt_failing_obligation {
Expand Down
10 changes: 10 additions & 0 deletions src/librustc/traits/fulfill.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -184,6 +184,16 @@ impl<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> FulfillmentContext<'tcx> {
});
}

pub fn register_predicate_obligations(&mut self,
infcx: &InferCtxt<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx>,
obligations: Vec<PredicateObligation<'tcx>>)
{
for obligation in obligations {
self.register_predicate_obligation(infcx, obligation);
}
}


pub fn region_obligations(&self,
body_id: ast::NodeId)
-> &[RegionObligation<'tcx>]
Expand Down
7 changes: 3 additions & 4 deletions src/librustc/traits/specialize/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ fn fulfill_implication<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx>(infcx: &InferCtxt<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx>,
-> Result<&'tcx Substs<'tcx>, ()> {
let selcx = &mut SelectionContext::new(&infcx);
let target_substs = infcx.fresh_substs_for_item(DUMMY_SP, target_impl);
let (target_trait_ref, obligations) = impl_trait_ref_and_oblig(selcx,
let (target_trait_ref, mut obligations) = impl_trait_ref_and_oblig(selcx,
target_impl,
target_substs);

Expand All @@ -227,9 +227,8 @@ fn fulfill_implication<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx>(infcx: &InferCtxt<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx>,
&ObligationCause::dummy(),
source_trait_ref,
target_trait_ref) {
Ok(InferOk { obligations, .. }) => {
// FIXME(#32730) propagate obligations
assert!(obligations.is_empty())
Ok(InferOk { obligations: o, .. }) => {
obligations.extend(o);
}
Err(_) => {
debug!("fulfill_implication: {:?} does not unify with {:?}",
Expand Down
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions src/librustc_driver/test.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ impl<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> Env<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
pub fn check_sub(&self, t1: Ty<'tcx>, t2: Ty<'tcx>) {
match self.sub(t1, t2) {
Ok(InferOk { obligations, .. }) => {
// FIXME(#32730) once obligations are being propagated, assert the right thing.
// None of these tests should require nested obligations:
assert!(obligations.is_empty());
}
Err(ref e) => {
Expand All @@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ impl<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> Env<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
pub fn check_lub(&self, t1: Ty<'tcx>, t2: Ty<'tcx>, t_lub: Ty<'tcx>) {
match self.lub(t1, t2) {
Ok(InferOk { obligations, value: t }) => {
// FIXME(#32730) once obligations are being propagated, assert the right thing.
// None of these tests should require nested obligations:
assert!(obligations.is_empty());

self.assert_eq(t, t_lub);
Expand All @@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ impl<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> Env<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
match self.glb(t1, t2) {
Err(e) => panic!("unexpected error computing LUB: {:?}", e),
Ok(InferOk { obligations, value: t }) => {
// FIXME(#32730) once obligations are being propagated, assert the right thing.
// None of these tests should require nested obligations:
assert!(obligations.is_empty());

self.assert_eq(t, t_glb);
Expand Down
7 changes: 3 additions & 4 deletions src/librustc_typeck/check/compare_method.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -294,10 +294,9 @@ fn compare_predicate_entailment<'a, 'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'a, 'tcx, 'tcx>,
debug!("compare_impl_method: trait_fty={:?}", trait_fty);

let sub_result = infcx.sub_types(false, &cause, impl_fty, trait_fty)
.map(|InferOk { obligations, .. }| {
// FIXME(#32730) propagate obligations
assert!(obligations.is_empty());
});
.map(|InferOk { obligations, .. }| {
inh.register_predicates(obligations);
});

if let Err(terr) = sub_result {
debug!("sub_types failed: impl ty {:?}, trait ty {:?}",
Expand Down
5 changes: 2 additions & 3 deletions src/librustc_typeck/check/dropck.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ fn ensure_drop_params_and_item_params_correspond<'a, 'tcx>(
// check that the impl type can be made to match the trait type.

let impl_param_env = ty::ParameterEnvironment::for_item(tcx, self_type_node_id);
tcx.infer_ctxt(impl_param_env, Reveal::UserFacing).enter(|infcx| {
tcx.infer_ctxt(impl_param_env, Reveal::UserFacing).enter(|ref infcx| {
let tcx = infcx.tcx;
let mut fulfillment_cx = traits::FulfillmentContext::new();

Expand All @@ -97,8 +97,7 @@ fn ensure_drop_params_and_item_params_correspond<'a, 'tcx>(
let cause = &ObligationCause::misc(drop_impl_span, drop_impl_node_id);
match infcx.eq_types(true, cause, named_type, fresh_impl_self_ty) {
Ok(InferOk { obligations, .. }) => {
// FIXME(#32730) propagate obligations
assert!(obligations.is_empty());
fulfillment_cx.register_predicate_obligations(infcx, obligations);
}
Err(_) => {
let item_span = tcx.hir.span(self_type_node_id);
Expand Down
17 changes: 12 additions & 5 deletions src/librustc_typeck/lib.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ use rustc::infer::InferOk;
use rustc::ty::subst::Substs;
use rustc::ty::{self, Ty, TyCtxt};
use rustc::ty::maps::Providers;
use rustc::traits::{ObligationCause, ObligationCauseCode, Reveal};
use rustc::traits::{FulfillmentContext, ObligationCause, ObligationCauseCode, Reveal};
use session::config;
use util::common::time;

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -153,15 +153,22 @@ fn require_same_types<'a, 'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'a, 'tcx, 'tcx>,
expected: Ty<'tcx>,
actual: Ty<'tcx>)
-> bool {
tcx.infer_ctxt((), Reveal::UserFacing).enter(|infcx| {
tcx.infer_ctxt((), Reveal::UserFacing).enter(|ref infcx| {
let mut fulfill_cx = FulfillmentContext::new();
match infcx.eq_types(false, &cause, expected, actual) {
Ok(InferOk { obligations, .. }) => {
// FIXME(#32730) propagate obligations
assert!(obligations.is_empty());
true
fulfill_cx.register_predicate_obligations(infcx, obligations);
}
Err(err) => {
infcx.report_mismatched_types(cause, expected, actual, err).emit();
return false;
}
}

match fulfill_cx.select_all_or_error(infcx) {
Ok(()) => true,
Err(errors) => {
infcx.report_fulfillment_errors(&errors);
false
}
}
Expand Down
16 changes: 16 additions & 0 deletions src/test/run-pass/issue-41298.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
// Copyright 2016 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT
// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at
// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your
// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
// except according to those terms.

struct Function<T, F> { t: T, f: F }

impl<T, R> Function<T, fn() -> R> { fn foo() { } }
impl<T, R> Function<T, fn() -> R> { fn bar() { } }

fn main() { }

0 comments on commit 1d1013d

Please sign in to comment.