Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 8, 2023. It is now read-only.

It's that time of the Quarter again ✨ - 2019 Q1 Planning πŸŽ‰ #792

Closed
6 tasks done
daviddias opened this issue Dec 8, 2018 · 7 comments
Closed
6 tasks done

Comments

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

daviddias commented Dec 8, 2018

Helloo everyone!!!

The end of the Quarter is quickly approaching and with it, it is time for us to do the OKR Planning Dance for 2019 Q1 πŸ•ΊπŸ½πŸ’ƒπŸ½!

I've gone in great length explaining how this happens in the past and I took notes from that thread and incorporated them on our OKR Notes.

The tl;dr;/TODO list/Summary you have to have in mind is:

If you are new to this whole process, check in with your Working Group colleagues and go through the issue that covers how we did it for 2018 Q4, it will provide you a great deal of context. Nevertheless, post all your questions so that we make sure to get them answered and improve our docs in the process ✨

@daviddias daviddias mentioned this issue Dec 9, 2018
4 tasks
@daviddias
Copy link
Member Author

daviddias commented Dec 9, 2018

Open OKR Planning PRs:

@daviddias
Copy link
Member Author

daviddias commented Dec 9, 2018

Also, has it is now traditional, there will be an Open Call to introduce OKRs to everyone led by @steverichmond on Dec 19, 5pm UTC

The agenda looks like this (sorting was done to make it timezone friendly):

image

Zoom URL: https://protocol.zoom.us/my/steverichmond

@daviddias
Copy link
Member Author

@ipfs/working-group-captains

alanshaw added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 11, 2018
refs #792

- [ ] [Score 2018 Q4 OKRs](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/139lROP7-Ee4M4S7A_IO4iIgSgugYm7dct620LYnalII/edit#gid=274358435)
- [ ] [Async Retrospective](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z6_eTW_8pI5VUj5UMq4K_Gpofofd7ENwzLdEBCuNULI/edit)
- [ ] 2019 Q1 OKRs Open Planning (this thread)
- [ ] Move 2019 Q1 OKRs to [2019 Q1 OKRs Spreadsheet](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1BtOfd7s9oYO5iKsIorCpsm4QuQoIsoZzSz7GItE-9ys/edit#gid=274358435)

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Alan Shaw <alan.shaw@protocol.ai>
@alanshaw alanshaw mentioned this issue Dec 11, 2018
4 tasks
@daviddias
Copy link
Member Author

Cluster, GUI, Infrastructure, Integration with Web Browsers, Dynamic Data and Capabilities, Decentralized Data Stewardship and Local Offline Collaboration, we are missing your PRs/Open Planning Discussion points.

This was referenced Dec 12, 2018
@momack2
Copy link
Contributor

momack2 commented Dec 12, 2018

We have one for Local Offline Collab here: ipfs/local-offline-collab#5, but also created the reference file here: #803

@daviddias
Copy link
Member Author

Two kind reminders:

  • Use this Open OKR Planning as an opportunity to propagate requests, asks, check in with other Working Groups Plans.
  • Draft OKRs presentations are on Dec 19th. It is ok if you then have to update them after, but they should be a close representation of the work that is planned Q1 2019.

@daviddias
Copy link
Member Author

daviddias commented Dec 18, 2018

Hi everyone again!

Today I've a "protip" to share with you all. To avoid the trap of overloading your OKRs spreadsheets, consider checking in on how much time you have actually available during the quarter an plan for 60% of that only.

Q1 roughly looks like this
image

Nevertheless, that is the maximum available. You should take out the days you are going to spend at conferences, hack weeks, research retreats, etc and only then calculate your 60%. Here is an example:

  • 13 weeks in the quarter - 65 days (assuming 5 day work week)
  • Take out the first 2 days (NYE and Jan 1) - 63
  • Now if you happen to have planned 15 days of Vacation + Hack Weeks + conferencing, etc. Then you have left 48 days.
  • 48 days in a 8 hour work day is 384 hours
  • 60% of that is 230.4 hours

In this example, the OKRs should only contemplate work you could do in 230.4 hours. And yes, it is incredibly hard to estimate how much time a task does, but we often fall into the trap of planning 3x to 5x the work we could possibly do in the time we have available, so this exercise is a good tool to help us prioritize and drop stuff right before the Quarter starts.

See my calculation here -- #793 (comment)

@daviddias daviddias added the status/ready Ready to be worked label Jan 4, 2019
@momack2 momack2 added status/in-progress In progress and removed status/ready Ready to be worked labels Jan 9, 2019
alanshaw added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2019
* docs: 2019 Q1 JS IPFS WG OKRs

refs #792

- [ ] [Score 2018 Q4 OKRs](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/139lROP7-Ee4M4S7A_IO4iIgSgugYm7dct620LYnalII/edit#gid=274358435)
- [ ] [Async Retrospective](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z6_eTW_8pI5VUj5UMq4K_Gpofofd7ENwzLdEBCuNULI/edit)
- [ ] 2019 Q1 OKRs Open Planning (this thread)
- [ ] Move 2019 Q1 OKRs to [2019 Q1 OKRs Spreadsheet](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1BtOfd7s9oYO5iKsIorCpsm4QuQoIsoZzSz7GItE-9ys/edit#gid=274358435)

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Alan Shaw <alan.shaw@protocol.ai>

* feat: WIP intitial stab at OKRs and prioritising

* docs: updated OKRs

* Update JS_CORE.md

* refactor: drop homebrew for more complete API

* feat: add connectivity KR
@ghost ghost removed the status/in-progress In progress label Apr 28, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants