Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Fix header issue causing tabs to be hidden #1542

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 16, 2023

Conversation

ibolton336
Copy link
Member

@ibolton336 ibolton336 commented Nov 15, 2023

Resolves https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MTA-1651

Wrapping the Tabs component inside a div helps manage the overflow issue seen when testing responsiveness of drawer.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 15, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (c376994) 40.49% compared to head (9aed9cd) 40.49%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1542   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   40.49%   40.49%           
=======================================
  Files         145      145           
  Lines        4638     4638           
  Branches     1087     1087           
=======================================
  Hits         1878     1878           
  Misses       2746     2746           
  Partials       14       14           
Flag Coverage Δ
client 40.49% <ø> (ø)
server ∅ <ø> (∅)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@sjd78 sjd78 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I know it is stupid, but just wrapping the Tabs component in a div will make them show up. Then the header can remain above the scrolling section.

@ibolton336 ibolton336 force-pushed the mta-1651 branch 3 times, most recently from 140f5ee to 77a74e4 Compare November 16, 2023 14:22
Signed-off-by: ibolton336 <ibolton@redhat.com>
Copy link
Member

@sjd78 sjd78 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ibolton336 ibolton336 merged commit 924ef4e into konveyor:main Nov 16, 2023
6 checks passed
sjd78 added a commit to sjd78/tackle2-ui that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2023
Refactor the header and layout of tabs for the dependencies detail
drawer following the changes in konveyor#1542.

Signed-off-by: Scott J Dickerson <sdickers@redhat.com>
sjd78 added a commit to sjd78/tackle2-ui that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2023
Refactor the header and layout of tabs for the dependencies detail
drawer following the changes in konveyor#1542.

Signed-off-by: Scott J Dickerson <sdickers@redhat.com>
sjd78 added a commit to sjd78/tackle2-ui that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2023
Changes:
  - Refactor the header and layout of tabs for the dependencies detail
    drawer following the changes in konveyor#1542.

  - Show the dependency name and provider in the header since those
    two fields together are the row unique key

  - Update the filter for the dependency applications to include both
    the name and the provider to match the row unique key

Signed-off-by: Scott J Dickerson <sdickers@redhat.com>
sjd78 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2023
…#1552)

Changes:
  - Refactor the header and layout of tabs for the dependencies detail
    drawer following the changes in #1542.

  - Show the dependency name and provider in the header since those two
    fields together are the row unique key (see #1554).

  - Update the filter for the dependency applications to include both the
    name and the provider to match the row unique key (see #1554).

Signed-off-by: Scott J Dickerson <sdickers@redhat.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants