Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add slots to MaterialProcessing classes that were on omics processing #7

Conversation

mslarae13
Copy link
Collaborator

nucl_acid_ext exists on OmicsProcessing (DataGeneration) and Biosample

This PR is adding MIXS slot nucl_acid_ext as a narrow_mapping for extraction_method and extraction_target as it's providing BOTH
This PR also adds http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCIT_C177560 as a narrow_mapping for both extraction_method and extraction_target as this is also a more specific way of identifying BOTH.

@anastasiyaprymolenna
Copy link
Collaborator

@aclum extraction_method slot on Class:Extraction needs to reviewed. We should get rid of it if it is not being used because the enum it is using is shared with extraction_target so it is not informative.

@mbthornton-lbl
Copy link
Collaborator

All wrong try again

@aclum
Copy link
Collaborator

aclum commented Dec 13, 2023

@anastasiyaprymolenna see example data https://github.com/microbiomedata/nmdc-schema/blob/main/src/data/valid/Database-nucleic-extraction.yaml
extraction_method was intended to store some short string to summarize how the extraction was done, it is not intended to specify what the target (DNA, RNA) to extract is.

@mslarae13 mslarae13 merged commit df30da1 into main Dec 13, 2023
2 checks passed
@mslarae13 mslarae13 deleted the 1525-add-slots-to-MaterialProcessing-classes-that-were-on-OmicsProcessing branch December 13, 2023 23:05
@brynnz22
Copy link
Collaborator

no migration

@brynnz22 brynnz22 changed the title 1525 add slots to material processing classes that were on omics processing add slots to MaterialProcessing classes that were on omics processing Apr 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants