[configtelemetry] Mark module as stable

[mx-psi]

Description

Fixes #10277

Depends on #10912

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.03%. Comparing base (7da6b61) to head (b0d5dda).
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #11002   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.03%   92.03%           
=======================================
  Files         412      412           
  Lines       19313    19313           
=======================================
  Hits        17774    17774           
  Misses       1185     1185           
  Partials      354      354           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[atoulme]

Approved after dependency is solved.

[mx-psi]

cc @open-telemetry/collector-approvers I believe this is ready to merge!

[bogdandrutu]

Personal opinion, I would try first to completely remove this module instead of making it stable. Why?

• Otel doesn't have a concept of telemetry level and us in otel-collector inventing this is not the right thing.
• This concept was added to control "expensive" telemetry (more exactly only metrics), but that can be now controlled with views.

[mx-psi]

This concept was added to control "expensive" telemetry (more exactly only metrics), but that can be now controlled with views.

This feels like a way of how to implement the level (each level corresponds to a set of views), but not an argument to remove the level. We have discussed this explicitly and the conclusion was that views alone would be complex for users to interact with