Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

the dev of [FEATURE]Auto reload model when cluster rebooted/node rejoin #711

Merged
merged 30 commits into from
Feb 20, 2023

Conversation

wujunshen
Copy link

Signed-off-by: JunShen Wu wjunshen@amazon.com

Description

the new feature:
Auto reload model when cluster rebooted/node rejoin

When a ml node under the opensearch cluster halt down with some unknown reasons. The models under this node will be broken and impact the process of the inference or reduced performance. So we add a new feature: When a ml node halt down, we reboot this ml node, the opensearch on this node will auto reload all the models under this node,and user will not reload the model manually. Even in extreme cases, if the reload operation is still unsuccessful, opensearch will also tell the user via logs that the reload was unsuccessful.

Issues Resolved

please see: #577

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing.
    • All tests pass
  • New functionality has been documented.
    • New functionality has javadoc added
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

@wujunshen wujunshen requested review from a team, zane-neo and ylwu-amzn January 25, 2023 09:32
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 25, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #711 (467250e) into 2.x (ffb8a4e) will increase coverage by 0.32%.
The diff coverage is 90.22%.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.x     #711      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     84.95%   85.27%   +0.32%     
- Complexity     1076     1105      +29     
============================================
  Files           100      101       +1     
  Lines          3922     4055     +133     
  Branches        370      378       +8     
============================================
+ Hits           3332     3458     +126     
- Misses          433      440       +7     
  Partials        157      157              
Flag Coverage Δ
ml-commons 85.27% <90.22%> (+0.32%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...a/org/opensearch/ml/model/MLModelAutoReloader.java 89.76% <89.76%> (ø)
...rg/opensearch/ml/plugin/MachineLearningPlugin.java 98.85% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
.../org/opensearch/ml/settings/MLCommonsSettings.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...earch/ml/action/load/TransportLoadModelAction.java 85.84% <0.00%> (+1.76%) ⬆️
.../cluster/MLCommonsClusterManagerEventListener.java 79.41% <0.00%> (+11.76%) ⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

* the main method: model auto reloading
*/
public void autoReLoadModel() {
log.info("enableAutoReLoadModel: {} ", enableAutoReLoadModel);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Log message is not so readable. How about changing to "Auto reload model enabled: {}"

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done


String localNodeId = clusterService.localNode().getId();
// auto reload all models of this local ml node
threadPool.generic().submit(() -> {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it is another function,if I use load model thread poo,it maybe will effect the original process of model load

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

threadPool.generic() is not dedicated for ML. Using this thread pool may impact other OpenSearch tasks. Suggest change to ML dedicated load model thread pool.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, I use threadPool.executor(LOAD_THREAD_POOL)

try {
autoReLoadModelByNodeId(localNodeId);
} catch (ExecutionException | InterruptedException e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add error log here?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, added it~

indexName
);

indicesExistsRequestBuilder.execute(ActionListener.wrap(actionListener::onResponse, actionListener::onFailure));
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about just checking if index exists in cluster metadata ? Refer to PR #717

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, it is a very useful suggestion, I can reduce the complexity of coding implement, thanks.

indexResponseActionListener.onResponse(indexResponse);
return;
}
indexResponseActionListener.onFailure(new RuntimeException("node id:" + localNodeId + " insert retry times unsuccessfully"));
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change to MLException ?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

log.error("Can't auto reload model in node id {} ,has tried {} times\nThe reason is:{}", localNodeId, reTryTimes, e);
}

// Store the latest value of the reTryTimes and node id under the index ".plugins-ml-model-reload"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any reason we have to persist retryTimes to index ? Is it ok to just cache retry times in memory?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

because when the ml-node happened reboot,the info of retrying time will be lost in cache if we put them in cache

autoReLoadModelByNodeAndModelId(localNodeId, mlTask.getModelId());

// if reload the model successfully,the number of unsuccessful reload should be reset to zero.
result.setReTryTimes(reTryTimes);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Load model is async, I don't think we are sure model loaded successfully even line 188 autoReLoadModelByNodeAndModelId(localNodeId, mlTask.getModelId()); doesn't throw exception.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you need to update the retry times in the ML_MODEL_RELOAD_INDEX to 0 after loading successfully? For instance, the reload succeeded at the 3rd time so you need to reset the retry value in the index from 2 to 0?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes,the code have had “if success,reset to zero” function

mlLoadModelRequest,
ActionListener
.wrap(response -> log.info("the model {} is auto reloading under the node {} ", modelId, localNodeId), exception -> {
log.error("fail to reload model " + modelId + " under the node " + localNodeId + "\nthe reason is: " + exception);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see retryTimes + 1 here, is that correct? I think we should count this failure in retry times

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

because the method autoReLoadModelByNodeAndModelId will throw exception to upper method,and the line188 mentioned in the previous comment will be caught, so retyrTimes+1 is written in the catch statement(the line 195)

}

int reTryTimes = 0;
try (XContentParser parser = createXContentParserFromRegistry(xContentRegistry, result.getHits()[0].getSourceRef())) {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From result.getHits()[0], seems it will only reload the first model?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This retryTimes is defined based on the dimension of node, not node+model.
In other words, there is only one value of the retryTimes for each ml node

QueryBuilder queryBuilder = QueryBuilders
.boolQuery()
.must(QueryBuilders.matchPhraseQuery("task_type", "LOAD_MODEL"))
.must(QueryBuilders.matchPhraseQuery("state", "COMPLETED"))
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should also consider COMPLETED_WITH_ERROR which means the model isn't loaded to all workers nodes, but loaded on some worker nodes successfully.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay, I found that there may be a time difference, when I wrote the code,the enumeration class MLTaskState does not exist COMPLETED_WITH_ERROR, I add this to my code

public static final String ML_MODEL_RELOAD_INDEX = ".plugins-ml-model-reload";
public static final String NODE_ID_FIELD = "node_id";
public static final String MODEL_LOAD_RETRY_TIMES_FIELD = "retry_times";
public static final Integer ML_MODEL_RELOAD_MAX_RETRY_TIMES = 2;
Copy link
Collaborator

@ylwu-amzn ylwu-amzn Feb 3, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we still need this constant as we have setting MLCommonsSettings.ML_MODEL_RELOAD_MAX_RETRY_TIMES;?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, u r right, We don't need it in class CommonValue. But we need it in opensearch.yml,so we can let user define the value by himself.

Copy link
Collaborator

@Zhangxunmt Zhangxunmt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it possible to test this auto reload in a local cluster? like creating a 2 nodes cluster, and kill one of the OS process in 1 node, etc?

}

@Data
static class Result {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This class name "Result" looks too general and confusing. Let's rename it to something more meaningful? e.g. ModelsToRestore?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I found after referring to PR #717, We will not need this Result any more.so I refactored it~

private final NamedXContentRegistry xContentRegistry;
private final DiscoveryNodeHelper nodeHelper;
private final ThreadPool threadPool;
private volatile Boolean enableAutoReLoadModel;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

reload is a full word. Maybe we don't need to do camel casing for reload. enableAutoReloadModel?

Same comment for retry

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, I will search reload and retry and will refactor these 2 names in anywhere

// According to the node id to get retry times, if more than the max retry times, don't need to retry
// that the number of unsuccessful reload has reached the maximum number of times, do not need to reload
if (result.getReTryTimes() > autoReLoadMaxReTryTimes) {
log.info("have exceeded max retry times, always failure");
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about: log.info("Node: {} has reached to the max retry limit, failed to load models", localNodeId)

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that's cool

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

have committed the code

@@ -32,6 +32,11 @@ public class CommonValue {
public static final String ML_TASK_INDEX = ".plugins-ml-task";
public static final Integer ML_MODEL_INDEX_SCHEMA_VERSION = 3;
public static final Integer ML_TASK_INDEX_SCHEMA_VERSION = 1;

public static final String ML_MODEL_RELOAD_INDEX = ".plugins-ml-model-reload";
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A general question: Is it possible to avoid using a new index to achieve auto reload? Can we just query the Task index and find out all the loaded models in the current node and reload them all after OS started? I may missed some discussion earlier, but it looks like the retry number and search results can be stored locally in the memory.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If this ml node has been restarted for some unknown reason, I can still use the persistent retryTimes value to know how many times the models on this node have been auto-reloaded before, then decide whether to do auto-reload this time. but if it is placed in cache, I can't get this info and have to auto-reload again. both are compared. The former may have some performance improvement

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, but this is a trade off for performance improvement by using a lot more resources. Is it possible to define this auto_reload as a ml_task and reuse the ml_task index to store the retry_times? Adding 2 new fields in ml_task may be much cheaper than using a new index. Thoughts?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After the communication with you and charlie, we will elaborate

wujunshen and others added 21 commits February 10, 2023 00:20
Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: opensearch-ci-bot <opensearch-infra@amazon.com>

Signed-off-by: opensearch-ci-bot <opensearch-infra@amazon.com>
Co-authored-by: opensearch-ci-bot <opensearch-infra@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yaliang Wu <ylwu@amazon.com>

Signed-off-by: Yaliang Wu <ylwu@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
…713)

Signed-off-by: Yaliang Wu <ylwu@amazon.com>

Signed-off-by: Yaliang Wu <ylwu@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
…rameter (#714)

* Enhance profile API to add model centric result controled by view paramter

Signed-off-by: Zan Niu <zaniu@amazon.com>

* Enhance profile API to add model centric result controled by view parameter

Signed-off-by: Zan Niu <zaniu@amazon.com>

* Enhance profile API to add model centric result controled by view parameter

Signed-off-by: Zan Niu <zaniu@amazon.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Zan Niu <zaniu@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
* add planning work nodes to model

Signed-off-by: Yaliang Wu <ylwu@amazon.com>

* add test

Signed-off-by: Yaliang Wu <ylwu@amazon.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Yaliang Wu <ylwu@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yaliang Wu <ylwu@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
* refactor: add DL model class

Signed-off-by: Yaliang Wu <ylwu@amazon.com>

* fix model url in example doc

Signed-off-by: Yaliang Wu <ylwu@amazon.com>

* address comments

Signed-off-by: Yaliang Wu <ylwu@amazon.com>

* fix failed ut

Signed-off-by: Yaliang Wu <ylwu@amazon.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Yaliang Wu <ylwu@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yaliang Wu <ylwu@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
…in cluster metadata

Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
…nValue.java

Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
log
.error(
"the model auto-reloading has exception,and the root cause message is: {}",
ExceptionUtils.getRootCauseMessage(e)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about print the full exception stack trace here? Just print out the root cause seems not easy to debug.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can I use ExceptionUtils.getMessage(e)?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think for a while,and changed it to ExceptionUtils.getStackTrace(e) at last.

Copy link
Collaborator

@zane-neo zane-neo Feb 17, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Print the entire exception stack is useful and convenient to locate and debug issues, you can change to log .error("the model auto-reloading has exception,and the root cause message is: {}", e)

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cool~I will modify it according to what you said

*/
@VisibleForTesting
void autoReloadModelByNodeAndModelId(String localNodeId, String modelId) throws MLException {
String[] allNodeIds = nodeHelper.getAllNodeIds();
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nodeHelper.getAllNodeIds() will return all nodes , not just ML nodes. Should we reload model on all nodes?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, I will modify it. Let the collection just have all ids of ml node.

1. Let the collection just have all ids of ml node
2. print out full exception stack trace

Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
@@ -32,6 +32,11 @@ public class CommonValue {
public static final String ML_TASK_INDEX = ".plugins-ml-task";
public static final Integer ML_MODEL_INDEX_SCHEMA_VERSION = 3;
public static final Integer ML_TASK_INDEX_SCHEMA_VERSION = 1;

public static final String ML_MODEL_RELOAD_INDEX = ".plugins-ml-model-reload";
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, but this is a trade off for performance improvement by using a lot more resources. Is it possible to define this auto_reload as a ml_task and reuse the ml_task index to store the retry_times? Adding 2 new fields in ml_task may be much cheaper than using a new index. Thoughts?

// that the number of unsuccessful reload has reached the maximum number of times, do not need to reload
if (retryTimes > autoReloadMaxRetryTimes) {
log.info("Node: {} has reached to the max retry limit, failed to load models", localNodeId);
return;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Before return, should we check how long the node has been in the max retry status and reset to 0 after a substantial time? It looks to me the node will never reload forever once reached maximum retry times.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in the first comment of yours, I found ml_task index and ml_model index are both definition in ml_task index, so if I add 2 new fields in ml_task,the ml_model index will have these 2 fields,too. It sounds that give ml_model index redundant attributes.
in the second comment of yours, when we discussed the design earlier, if the maximum retry times is reached, instead of automatically reloading, the model need to be loaded manually.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool. Let's keep this logic then. But we should try to define a new type of ML Task for auto reload, and reuse MLTask to store the max_retry field, etc.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks~

Zhangxunmt
Zhangxunmt previously approved these changes Feb 17, 2023

searchRequestBuilder.execute(ActionListener.wrap(searchResponseActionListener::onResponse, exception -> {
log.error("index {} not found, the reason is {}", ML_TASK_INDEX, exception);
throw new IndexNotFoundException("index " + ML_TASK_INDEX + " not found");
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can't confirm this is IndexNotFoundException, please throw a MLException instead, and please wrap the original exception into the MLException like this:throw new MLException(exception)

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, I have changed it~

return;
}
indexResponseActionListener.onFailure(new MLException("node id:" + localNodeId + " insert retry times unsuccessfully"));
}, indexResponseActionListener::onFailure));
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add logs here when receiving indexRequestBuilder.execute exception.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done~


String localNodeId = clusterService.localNode().getId();
// auto reload all models of this local ml node
threadPool.generic().submit(() -> {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please change this threadpool to UPLOAD_THREAD_POOL in MachineLearningPlugin since this is dedicated for uploading models.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

en ,yaliang have said it~ I have committed the latest code

use LOAD_THREAD_POOL to replace generic

Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
print the whole exception stack

Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
change the IndexNotFoundException to MLException

Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
add logs when receiving indexRequestBuilder.execute exception

Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
change the test code after code review

Signed-off-by: wujunshen <frank_wjs@hotmail.com>
@model-collapse model-collapse self-assigned this Feb 20, 2023
@model-collapse model-collapse merged commit 7a51dcc into opensearch-project:2.x Feb 20, 2023
*/
@VisibleForTesting
void queryTask(String localNodeId, ActionListener<SearchResponse> searchResponseActionListener) {
SearchSourceBuilder searchSourceBuilder = new SearchSourceBuilder().from(0).size(1);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This query only return the latest load model task. If user have 3 models, this query only return 1 latest load model task for 1 model, the other 2 models' tasks won't be returned. So we can't reload all 3 models, just reload 1 model. Is that correct?

private volatile Integer autoReloadMaxRetryTimes;

/**
* constructor method, init all the params necessary for model auto reloading
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This after constructor method is not US-ASCII. That will cause infra team's CI workflow failure. #736

ylwu-amzn added a commit to ylwu-amzn/ml-commons that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2023
ylwu-amzn added a commit to ylwu-amzn/ml-commons that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2023
…ode rejoin (opensearch-project#711)"

This reverts commit 7a51dcc.

Signed-off-by: Yaliang Wu <ylwu@amazon.com>
ylwu-amzn added a commit to ylwu-amzn/ml-commons that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2023
…ode rejoin (opensearch-project#711)"

This reverts commit 7a51dcc.

Signed-off-by: Yaliang Wu <ylwu@amazon.com>
Zhangxunmt pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2023
* fix unmappable character for encoding US-ASCII

Signed-off-by: Yaliang Wu <ylwu@amazon.com>

* Revert "the dev of [FEATURE]Auto reload model when cluster rebooted/node rejoin (#711)"

This reverts commit 7a51dcc.

Signed-off-by: Yaliang Wu <ylwu@amazon.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Yaliang Wu <ylwu@amazon.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants