-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 577
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: rptest.tests.topic_delete_test.TopicDeleteStressTest.stress_test unclean client shutdown #4326
Comments
@rystsov when I disable idempotence this problem appears to go away. diff --git a/src/v/config/configuration.cc b/src/v/config/configuration.cc
index e98586cb5..98dd96e94 100644
--- a/src/v/config/configuration.cc
+++ b/src/v/config/configuration.cc
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ configuration::configuration()
"enable_idempotence",
"Enable idempotent producer",
{.visibility = visibility::user},
- true)
+ false)
, enable_transactions(
*this,
"enable_transactions", The message |
This is a lighter touch than marking the test ok_to_fail: we are specifically just tolerating failures that result from the unexpected RPC error. Related: redpanda-data#4326
This failed 7/54 runs in the last 24h, last example was https://buildkite.com/redpanda/redpanda/builds/9256#138b41aa-c3a9-439a-a21f-c113c5af1636 I was about to mark it ok_to_fail, but I think it's better to just make it temporarily tolerant of this error message |
This is a lighter touch than marking the test ok_to_fail: we are specifically just tolerating failures that result from the unexpected RPC error. Related: redpanda-data#4326
This is a lighter touch than marking the test ok_to_fail: we are specifically just tolerating failures that result from the unexpected RPC error. Related: redpanda-data#4326
This is a lighter touch than marking the test ok_to_fail: we are specifically just tolerating failures that result from the unexpected RPC error. Related: redpanda-data#4326 (cherry picked from commit 7bac61f)
@rystsov: not a release blocker moving to next patch release |
This is a lighter touch than marking the test ok_to_fail: we are specifically just tolerating failures that result from the unexpected RPC error. Related: redpanda-data#4326
#5238 introduces a new workload & online verifier which isn't subject to such errors when it's it we switch to it and it will fix this issue |
nice! |
@rystsov can you decide if this important, fixed, etc...? |
No repros in 30d |
when looking into the logs around the time that the badlogline was reported, it seems as though ducktape may have kill -9 on a kafka client which could cause this issue. it may be that we need to improve unclean shutdown.
this looks like a kafka client terminated or crashed in the test.
Originally posted by @dotnwat in #4199 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: