Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

appveyor: Downgrade MinGW to 6.2.0 #40865

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2017
Merged

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

It looks like the 6.3.0 MinGW comes with a gdb which has issues (#40184) that an
attempted workaround (#40777) does not actually fix (#40835). The original
motivation for upgradin MinGW was to fix build flakiness (#40546) due to newer
builds not exhibiting the same bug, so let's hope that 6.2.0 isn't too far back
in time and still contains the fix we need.

Closes #40835

It looks like the 6.3.0 MinGW comes with a gdb which has issues (rust-lang#40184) that an
attempted workaround (rust-lang#40777) does not actually fix (rust-lang#40835). The original
motivation for upgradin MinGW was to fix build flakiness (rust-lang#40546) due to newer
builds not exhibiting the same bug, so let's hope that 6.2.0 isn't too far back
in time and still contains the fix we need.

Closes rust-lang#40835
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @aturon

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

arielb1 commented Mar 27, 2017

Let's see if this works.

@bors r+ p=10

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 27, 2017

📌 Commit e87dd42 has been approved by arielb1

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 27, 2017

⌛ Testing commit e87dd42 with merge dda4c6b...

alexcrichton added a commit to alexcrichton/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2017
…elb1

appveyor: Downgrade MinGW to 6.2.0

It looks like the 6.3.0 MinGW comes with a gdb which has issues (rust-lang#40184) that an
attempted workaround (rust-lang#40777) does not actually fix (rust-lang#40835). The original
motivation for upgradin MinGW was to fix build flakiness (rust-lang#40546) due to newer
builds not exhibiting the same bug, so let's hope that 6.2.0 isn't too far back
in time and still contains the fix we need.

Closes rust-lang#40835
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

alexcrichton commented Mar 27, 2017

@bors: retry

  • prioritizing rollup

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2017
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 28, 2017

⌛ Testing commit e87dd42 with merge c552cf3...

@arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

arielb1 commented Mar 28, 2017

@bors: retry

  • prioritizing rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 28, 2017

⌛ Testing commit e87dd42 with merge a446d75...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 28, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-travis

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2017
@bors bors merged commit e87dd42 into rust-lang:master Mar 29, 2017
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the downgrade-mingw branch April 4, 2017 23:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Debuginfo tests spurious failures on MinGW
5 participants