Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rustdoc: Add regression test for Iterator as notable trait on &mut T #91748

Conversation

notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

@notriddle notriddle commented Dec 10, 2021

Closes #80737

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 10, 2021
@notriddle notriddle force-pushed the notriddle/doc-notable_trait-mut_t_is_not_an_iterator branch from 2555b7b to 17206cb Compare December 10, 2021 16:27
@notriddle notriddle changed the title Add regression test for #80737 rustdoc: Add regression test for Iterator as notable trait on &mut T Dec 10, 2021
@camelid camelid added the T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Dec 11, 2021
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2021
…it-mut_t_is_not_ref_t, r=Mark-Simulacrum

rustdoc: Add regression test for Iterator as notable trait on &T

Closes rust-lang#78160

This regression test is different from the one in rust-lang#91748, because while neither of these function should have Iterator marked as a notable trait, the reasons are different.

* In this PR, it returns `&T where T: Iterator`. The `mut` is what's missing.
* In rust-lang#91748, it returns `&mut T`. The trait bounds are what's missing.
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 12, 2021

📌 Commit 17206cb has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 12, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2021
…askrgr

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#91746 (Btree: assert more API compatibility)
 - rust-lang#91748 (rustdoc: Add regression test for Iterator as notable trait on &mut T)
 - rust-lang#91811 (bootstrap: Change unwrap() to expect() for WIX path)
 - rust-lang#91814 (doc: fix typo in comments)
 - rust-lang#91815 (better span for unexpected normalization failure in CTFE engine)
 - rust-lang#91817 (rustbot: Add autolabeling for `T-rustdoc`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 5dec013 into rust-lang:master Dec 12, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.59.0 milestone Dec 12, 2021
@notriddle notriddle deleted the notriddle/doc-notable_trait-mut_t_is_not_an_iterator branch December 12, 2021 14:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

rustdoc: Notable traits shows wrong type parameter
6 participants