Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Move proto v1beta1 to v1 #870

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 6, 2022
Merged

chore: Move proto v1beta1 to v1 #870

merged 1 commit into from
May 6, 2022

Conversation

robert-zaremba
Copy link
Member

@robert-zaremba robert-zaremba commented May 5, 2022

Description

In Cosmos SDK we are using v1beta1 because we didn't release Cosmos SDK v1 and we were not sure about the final layout.

Unfortunately this pattern got copied in other projects without asking "why". We are not creating an SDK, but a final product, so we have our upcoming next production release.

Follow up tasks:

  • regenerate modules after the proto update
  • think about the submodules.

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • added appropriate labels to the PR
  • added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • included comments for documenting Go code
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage
  • manually tested (if applicable)

Copy link
Collaborator

@adamewozniak adamewozniak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm! but please add a changelog entry

+ update proto import paths
@robert-zaremba robert-zaremba requested a review from a team as a code owner May 6, 2022 13:34
@mergify mergify bot merged commit dc0e387 into main May 6, 2022
@mergify mergify bot deleted the robert/proto-v1 branch May 6, 2022 14:11
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2022
## Description

In Cosmos SDK we are using v1beta1 because we didn't release Cosmos SDK v1 and we were not sure about the final layout.

Unfortunately this pattern got copied in other projects without asking "why". We are not creating an SDK, but a final product, so we have our upcoming next production release.

Follow up tasks:
- [ ] regenerate modules after the proto update
- [ ] think about the submodules.

----

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added appropriate labels to the PR
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/umee-network/umee/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)

(cherry picked from commit dc0e387)
toteki pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2022
## Description

In Cosmos SDK we are using v1beta1 because we didn't release Cosmos SDK v1 and we were not sure about the final layout.

Unfortunately this pattern got copied in other projects without asking "why". We are not creating an SDK, but a final product, so we have our upcoming next production release.

Follow up tasks:
- [ ] regenerate modules after the proto update
- [ ] think about the submodules.

----

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added appropriate labels to the PR
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/umee-network/umee/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)

(cherry picked from commit dc0e387)

Co-authored-by: Robert Zaremba <robert@zaremba.ch>
@toteki toteki mentioned this pull request May 6, 2022
18 tasks
toteki added a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2022
toteki added a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants