Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🏃 Push logger further down into KubeadmControlPlane reconciliation methods #2380

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 20, 2020

Conversation

detiber
Copy link
Member

@detiber detiber commented Feb 20, 2020

What this PR does / why we need it:

Pushes the logger further down into the KubeadmControlPlane reconciliation methods to clean up the logging and error handling.

Related to #2242
Builds on #2379

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Feb 20, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: detiber

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 20, 2020
@detiber
Copy link
Member Author

detiber commented Feb 20, 2020

/assign @vincepri @chuckha @dlipovetsky

@detiber
Copy link
Member Author

detiber commented Feb 20, 2020

/test pull-cluster-api-capd-e2e

Copy link
Contributor

@chuckha chuckha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR is doing a bit more than just pushing the logger deeper, it appears to be a number of various clean ups.

However, the only question is around logging context and a global logger. If we need some context we cannot or do not want to rebuild deeper in the reconcile function, then passing the logger through makes sense. Otherwise, we can avoid passing the logger around and expanding a number of parameter lists by using a package (or module) global logger.

@chuckha
Copy link
Contributor

chuckha commented Feb 20, 2020

Oh, i see what's happening. I only need to be reviewing a single commit, not both.

@detiber
Copy link
Member Author

detiber commented Feb 20, 2020

Oh, i see what's happening. I only need to be reviewing a single commit, not both.

ah, yes, sorry. Things are a bit intertwined and this was my attempt to try and make it easier to review as well as start landing some of the changes independent of the full functionality

@chuckha
Copy link
Contributor

chuckha commented Feb 20, 2020

no worries, a comment in the description can help, but it's not a huge deal

@vincepri
Copy link
Member

/milestone v0.3.0-rc.2

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v0.3.0-rc.2 milestone Feb 20, 2020
@ncdc ncdc added the area/control-plane Issues or PRs related to control-plane lifecycle management label Feb 20, 2020
@detiber detiber force-pushed the kcpPushLoggerDown branch 2 times, most recently from 298697f to b227c77 Compare February 20, 2020 20:27
Copy link
Contributor

@chuckha chuckha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

func (r *KubeadmControlPlaneReconciler) upgradeControlPlane(ctx context.Context, cluster *clusterv1.Cluster, kcp *controlplanev1.KubeadmControlPlane, requireUpgrade internal.FilterableMachineCollection) error {

func (r *KubeadmControlPlaneReconciler) upgradeControlPlane(_ context.Context, cluster *clusterv1.Cluster, kcp *controlplanev1.KubeadmControlPlane) (ctrl.Result, error) { //nolint
_ = r.Log.WithValues("namespace", kcp.Namespace, "kubeadmControlPlane", kcp.Name, "cluster", cluster.Name)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

presumably this is for the following commits?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, mostly so I don't forget when I'm in refactor hell.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 20, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 9547a1c into kubernetes-sigs:master Feb 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/control-plane Issues or PRs related to control-plane lifecycle management cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants