Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

3-in-1 determine basal.kt including AutoISF #3206

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

ga-zelle
Copy link

This PR is focussed on the kt variant of DetermineBasal and a replacement of the earlier js-focussed PR #3161.

It proposes to unify AutoISF also into the dev version of SMB+DynISF unified to avoid extensive code duplication for a separate DetermineBasal containing AutoISF. The principle of inclusion was based on DynISF and AutoISF being mutually exclusive in their influence because I cannot see an option to combine any of their elements.

The existing kt versus js verification tests were re-run successfully for AMA, SMB and DynISF.

Again, I want to say thank you to @Philoul for his continued interest and consultancy

@ga-zelle ga-zelle closed this Jan 31, 2024
@ga-zelle ga-zelle deleted the 3-in-1_DetermineBasal.kt branch January 31, 2024 16:37
@ga-zelle ga-zelle restored the 3-in-1_DetermineBasal.kt branch January 31, 2024 17:31
@ga-zelle ga-zelle reopened this Jan 31, 2024
@ga-zelle ga-zelle changed the base branch from master to dev January 31, 2024 17:33
@ga-zelle ga-zelle changed the title 3-in-1 determine basal.kt uncluding AutoISF 3-in-1 determine basal.kt including AutoISF Jan 31, 2024
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jan 31, 2024

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions

20 Security Hotspots
D Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

idea Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint SonarLint

@MilosKozak
Copy link
Contributor

The amount of changes to determinebasal and profile is huge and makes the code unreadable. Even integration with DynISF is wrong. I'd create new plugin with new OAPSProfile

@ga-zelle ga-zelle closed this May 6, 2024
@ga-zelle
Copy link
Author

ga-zelle commented May 6, 2024

superseeded by #3327

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants