Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: claim n of m faucet #6389

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jul 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

SWvheerden
Copy link
Collaborator

@SWvheerden SWvheerden commented Jul 4, 2024

Description

Fixes n-of-m spending of faucets.

Motivation and Context

Allows spending of m-of-n

How Has This Been Tested?

Manual

@SWvheerden SWvheerden requested a review from a team as a code owner July 4, 2024 13:42
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 4, 2024

Test Results (CI)

    3 files    120 suites   37m 22s ⏱️
1 295 tests 1 295 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
3 877 runs  3 877 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit a7a2b3a.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@ghpbot-tari-project ghpbot-tari-project added P-acks_required Process - Requires more ACKs or utACKs P-reviews_required Process - Requires a review from a lead maintainer to be merged labels Jul 4, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 4, 2024

Test Results (Integration tests)

 2 files  + 2  11 suites  +11   15m 13s ⏱️ + 15m 13s
35 tests +35  34 ✅ +34  0 💤 ±0  1 ❌ +1 
36 runs  +36  35 ✅ +35  0 💤 ±0  1 ❌ +1 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit a7a2b3a. ± Comparison against base commit 0156fc5.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@SWvheerden SWvheerden changed the title [wip]fix: claim n of m faucet fix: claim n of m faucet Jul 5, 2024
@SWvheerden SWvheerden requested a review from a team as a code owner July 8, 2024 13:14
@hansieodendaal
Copy link
Contributor

I found another issue. The encumbered transaction (FaucetEncumberAggregateUtxo) is broadcast if the wallet is opened before it is finalized with FaucetSpendAggregateUtxo.

@SWvheerden
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Yeah lets keep that as a known issue, and you should use --command-mode-auto-exit for now

hansieodendaal
hansieodendaal previously approved these changes Jul 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@hansieodendaal hansieodendaal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work.

If SWvheerden#43 is merged I am happy.

@SWvheerden SWvheerden merged commit 2700a46 into tari-project:development Jul 11, 2024
14 of 16 checks passed
@SWvheerden SWvheerden deleted the sw_fix_n-of_m branch July 12, 2024 12:43
sdbondi added a commit to sdbondi/tari that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2024
* development: (93 commits)
  chore: fix build and osp (tari-project#6415)
  chore: refactor key manager names (tari-project#6411)
  fix: panic in from_base58 fn (tari-project#6414)
  fix: branch keys (tari-project#6413)
  chore: remove dependancy on ledger for common types (tari-project#6412)
  feat: count unique keys (tari-project#6401)
  feat!: fix key manager use of keys (tari-project#6407)
  refactor: remove metadata sig and use difference key branch for offset (tari-project#6400)
  feat: update ledger instructions (tari-project#6406)
  feat: add file-based input and output to faucet commands (tari-project#6405)
  chore: new release v1.0.0-pre.16 (tari-project#6404)
  feat: simplify leader sig generation (tari-project#6399)
  ci(fix): include macOS universal assets in release (tari-project#6402)
  fix: script dependance on party order (tari-project#6398)
  fix: claim n of m faucet (tari-project#6389)
  feat: add ffi features (tari-project#6390)
  chore: fix unwraps in memory key manager (tari-project#6396)
  docs: update hasher documentation (tari-project#6392)
  chore: fix ci (tari-project#6391)
  feat(miner): add SHA P2Pool mining related configuration and changes (tari-project#6370)
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
P-acks_required Process - Requires more ACKs or utACKs P-reviews_required Process - Requires a review from a lead maintainer to be merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants